These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37837325)

  • 21. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
    Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantifying stakeholders' preference for implantable medical devices in China: a discrete choice experiment.
    Wan B; Shen J; Chen J; Weng L; Zhao P; Deng Y; Zhang L; Zhang F; Wang Y; Li X; Chang F; Ding H; Lu Y
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2024 Jan; 40(1):e8. PubMed ID: 38221900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient preferences for heart valve disease intervention.
    Fifer S; Keen B; Guilbert-Wright P; Yamabe K; Murdoch DJ
    Health Expect; 2024 Feb; 27(1):e13929. PubMed ID: 38050462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.
    Xiao J; Wang F; Wang M; Ma Z
    Health Expect; 2022 Jun; 25(3):959-970. PubMed ID: 35049117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?
    Huls SPI; Lancsar E; Donkers B; Ride J
    Health Econ; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2630-2647. PubMed ID: 36102864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.
    Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Zweifel P; Johnson FR
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):2. PubMed ID: 26743636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Societal preferences for funding orphan drugs in China: An application of the discrete choice experiment method.
    Tan S; Wang Y; Tang Y; Jiang R; Chen M; Chen H; Yang F
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1005453. PubMed ID: 36579068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany.
    Günther OH; Kürstein B; Riedel-Heller SG; König HH
    Health Serv Res; 2010 Feb; 45(1):212-29. PubMed ID: 19780851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of information and deliberation on the consistency of preferences for prioritization in health care - evidence from discrete choice experiments undertaken alongside citizens' juries.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P; Ratcliffe J; Rixon K; Wilson A; Kendall E; Burton P; Chalkidou K; Scuffham PA
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1237-1249. PubMed ID: 37738383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.
    Schatz NK; Fabiano GA; Cunningham CE; dosReis S; Waschbusch DA; Jerome S; Lupas K; Morris KL
    Patient; 2015 Dec; 8(6):483-97. PubMed ID: 25644223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relative importance of clinical outcomes and safety risks of antiseizure medication monotherapy for patients and physicians: Discrete choice experiment eliciting preferences in real-world study "VOTE".
    Rosenow F; Winter Y; Leunikava I; Brunnert M; Joeres L; Sutphin J; Boeri M; Smith J; Villani F; Brandt C
    Epilepsia; 2022 Feb; 63(2):451-462. PubMed ID: 34921391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Public Preference for Off-Label Use of Drugs for Cancer Treatment and Relative Importance of Associated Adverse Events: A Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling.
    Wang K; Shum HM; Yam CH; Wu Y; Wong EL; Yeoh EK
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 Nov; 22(6):849-860. PubMed ID: 39256322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient Preferences for Device-Aided Treatments Indicated for Advanced Parkinson Disease.
    Marshall T; Pugh A; Fairchild A; Hass S
    Value Health; 2017 Dec; 20(10):1383-1393. PubMed ID: 29241898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
    Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
    Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.
    Jiang MZ; Fu Q; Xiong JY; Li XL; Jia EP; Peng YY; Shen X
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):430. PubMed ID: 32423447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Societal preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.
    Botha W; Donnolley N; Shanahan M; Norman RJ; Chambers GM
    J Med Econ; 2019 Jan; 22(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 30431385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.