119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37838189)
1. Cancer Detection Rate and Abnormal Interpretation Rate of Prostate MRI in Patients With Low-Grade Cancer.
Nakai H; Nagayama H; Takahashi H; Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Bolan CW; Adamo DA; Carter RE; Fazzio RT; Tsuji S; Lomas DJ; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Dora C; Takahashi N
J Am Coll Radiol; 2024 Mar; 21(3):387-397. PubMed ID: 37838189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cancer Detection Rate and Abnormal Interpretation Rate of Prostate MRI Performed for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Nagayama H; Nakai H; Takahashi H; Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Bolan CW; Adamo DA; Carter RE; Fazzio RT; Tsuji S; Lomas DJ; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Dora C; Takahashi N
J Am Coll Radiol; 2024 Mar; 21(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 37820833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.
Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Laqua N; Klingebiel M; Martin O; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 30927932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging in Peripheral Lesions in PI-RADS-4 Patients.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Laqua N; Abrar D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Rofo; 2020 May; 192(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 31622990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Prostate MRI Interpretation Experience on PPV Using PI-RADS Version 2: A 6-Year Assessment Among Eight Fellowship-Trained Radiologists.
Salka BR; Shankar PR; Troost JP; Khalatbari S; Davenport MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 35319914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In-bore 3.0-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Repeat Biopsy Population: Diagnostic Performance, Complications, and Learning Curve.
Friedl A; Schneeweiss J; Sevcenco S; Eredics K; Kunit T; Susani M; Kivaranovic D; Eisenhuber-Stadler E; Lusuardi L; Brössner C; Schima W
Urology; 2018 Apr; 114():139-146. PubMed ID: 29330001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current role of systematic biopsy in diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in primary combined MRI-targeted biopsy: a high-volume single-center study.
Krausewitz P; Fostitsch D; Weiten R; Kluemper N; Stein J; Luetkens J; Kristiansen G; Ellinger J; Ritter M
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 36477403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Tavakoli AA; Hielscher T; Badura P; Görtz M; Kuder TA; Gnirs R; Schwab C; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
Radiology; 2023 Jan; 306(1):186-199. PubMed ID: 35972360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
