185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37838608)
1. The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):e1-e17. PubMed ID: 37838608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104272. PubMed ID: 36038075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement or composite resin for restorations in posterior permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Cribari L; Madeira L; Roeder RBR; Macedo RM; Wambier LM; Porto TS; Gonzaga CC; Kaizer MR
J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104629. PubMed ID: 37499738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Pinto NS; Jorge GR; Vasconcelos J; Probst LF; De-Carli AD; Freire A
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):394. PubMed ID: 37322456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.
Worthington HV; Khangura S; Seal K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z; Rasines Alcaraz MG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD005620. PubMed ID: 34387873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC restorations: a systematic review.
Mickenautsch S; Tyas MJ; Yengopal V; Oliveira LB; Bönecker M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Sep; 18(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 21077424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogianis Y
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro.
Gama-Teixeira A; Simionato MR; Elian SN; Sobral MA; Luz MA
Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 18060266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molars.
Jones G; Taylor G
Evid Based Dent; 2018 Oct; 19(3):86-87. PubMed ID: 30361668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
