117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37838956)
1. [Accuracy of prostatic ultrasonography versus MRI in measuring prostate volume].
Hou JL; Ma WL; Dong X; Zhu XY; Zhang Q; Qiu XF; Zhuang JL; Huang HF; Guo HQ; Gan WD
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Oct; 28(10):896-900. PubMed ID: 37838956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transabdominal ultrasound and MRI with the radical prostatectomy specimen volume: a retrospective observational study.
Guo S; Zhang J; Jiao J; Li Z; Wu P; Jing Y; Qin W; Wang F; Ma S
BMC Urol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):62. PubMed ID: 37069539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Clarius, Handheld Wireless Point-of-Care Ultrasound, in Evaluating Prostate Morphology and Volume Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight: Is There a Difference between Transabdominal
Moussaoui G; Zakaria AS; Negrean C; Nguyen DD; Couture F; Tholomier C; Sadri I; Arezki A; Schwartz RN; Elterman DS; Misrai V; Bhojani N; Herrmann TRW; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1300-1306. PubMed ID: 33677990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimated Prostate Volume by Semiautomatic Segmentation of MRI Is More Accurately Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight than the Volume Calculated by Ellipsoid Formula.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Lin SX; Kim MM; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Wu CL; Dahl DM
Urol Int; 2024; 108(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 37995664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving ultrasound-based prostate volume estimation.
Aprikian S; Luz M; Brimo F; Scarlata E; Hamel L; Cury FL; Tanguay S; Aprikian AG; Kassouf W; Chevalier S
BMC Urol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 31340802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.
Park SB; Kim JK; Choi SH; Noh HN; Ji EK; Cho KS
Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11752939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of bent distortion on accuracy of measurement during transrectal ultrasonography for prostatic imaging: a preliminary study.
Lee HH; Lee JY; Yu HS; Diaz RR; Ham WS; Rha KH; Choi YD; Cho KS
Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 23337105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography.
Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of PSA density by 3 imaging modalities and its correlation with the PSA density of radical prostatectomy specimen.
Varkarakis I; Zarkadoulias A; Bourdoumis A; Chatzidarellis E; Antoniou N; Deliveliotis C
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1038-42. PubMed ID: 22196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Printed Models of Prostate Anatomy and Targeted Biopsy-proven Index Tumor to Facilitate Patient-tailored Radical Prostatectomy-A Feasibility Study.
Darr C; Finis F; Wiesenfarth M; Giganti F; Tschirdewahn S; Krafft U; Kesch C; Bonekamp D; Forsting M; Wetter A; Reis H; Hadaschik BA; Haubold J; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):357-361. PubMed ID: 32873530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from MR imaging data: comparison with radiologist-derived MR imaging and pathologic specimen volumes.
Bulman JC; Toth R; Patel AD; Bloch BN; McMahon CJ; Ngo L; Madabhushi A; Rofsky NM
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 22190657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which is the best radiological imaging method for predicting actual prostate weight?
Gok B; Hajiyev E; Hamidi N; Koc E; Asil E; Canda AE; Ardicoglu A; Atmaca AF; Keseroglu BB
Andrologia; 2020 Nov; 52(10):e13770. PubMed ID: 32721048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Wolff JM; Boeckmann W; Mattelaer P; Handt S; Adam G; Jakse G
Eur Urol; 1995; 28(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8521887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of bland-altman method in comparing transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography for estimating prostate volume.
Babaei Jandaghi A; Shakiba M; Nasseh H; Korouji Y; Esmaeili S; Khadem Maboudi AA; Khorshidi A
Iran J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 40(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25650064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
