These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37839019)
1. Assessing three soil removal methods for environmental DNA analysis of mock forensic geology evidence. Tiedge TM; Meiklejohn KA J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 37839019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single Fragment or Bulk Soil DNA Metabarcoding: Which is Better for Characterizing Biological Taxa Found in Surface Soils for Sample Separation? Boggs LM; Scheible MKR; Machado G; Meiklejohn KA Genes (Basel); 2019 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 31174412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A protocol for obtaining DNA barcodes from plant and insect fragments isolated from forensic-type soils. Meiklejohn KA; Jackson ML; Stern LA; Robertson JM Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1515-1526. PubMed ID: 29423711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers. Fahner NA; Shokralla S; Baird DJ; Hajibabaei M PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157505. PubMed ID: 27310720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) for characterizing land plants from soil. Timpano EK; Scheible MKR; Meiklejohn KA PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231436. PubMed ID: 32298321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finding the perfect pairs: A matchmaking of plant markers and primers for multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding. Espinosa Prieto A; Hardion L; Debortoli N; Beisel JN Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13937. PubMed ID: 38363053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Groundwater environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals hidden diversity and reflects land-use and geology. Couton M; Hürlemann S; Studer A; Alther R; Altermatt F Mol Ecol; 2023 Jul; 32(13):3497-3512. PubMed ID: 37067032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes. Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive biodiversity analysis via ultra-deep patterned flow cell technology: a case study of eDNA metabarcoding seawater. Singer GAC; Fahner NA; Barnes JG; McCarthy A; Hajibabaei M Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5991. PubMed ID: 30979963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PEMA: a flexible Pipeline for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Analysis of the 16S/18S ribosomal RNA, ITS, and COI marker genes. Zafeiropoulos H; Viet HQ; Vasileiadou K; Potirakis A; Arvanitidis C; Topalis P; Pavloudi C; Pafilis E Gigascience; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32161947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-destructive collection and metabarcoding of arthropod environmental DNA remained on a terrestrial plant. Yoneya K; Ushio M; Miki T Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7125. PubMed ID: 37173307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Future of Environmental DNA in Forensic Science. Allwood JS; Fierer N; Dunn RR Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 86(2):. PubMed ID: 31704676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The utility of dust for forensic intelligence: Exploring collection methods and detection limits for environmental DNA, elemental and mineralogical analyses of dust samples. Foster NR; Martin B; Hoogewerff J; Aberle MG; de Caritat P; Roffey P; Edwards R; Malik A; Thwaites P; Waycott M; Young J Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111599. PubMed ID: 36801501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The bug in a teacup-monitoring arthropod-plant associations with environmental DNA from dried plant material. Krehenwinkel H; Weber S; Künzel S; Kennedy SR Biol Lett; 2022 Jun; 18(6):20220091. PubMed ID: 35702982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinct community structures of soil nematodes from three ecologically different sites revealed by high-throughput amplicon sequencing of four 18S ribosomal RNA gene regions. Kenmotsu H; Ishikawa M; Nitta T; Hirose Y; Eki T PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249571. PubMed ID: 33857177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of DNA Sequencing and Analysis Methods on 16S rRNA Gene Bacterial Community Analysis of Dairy Products. Xue Z; Kable ME; Marco ML mSphere; 2018 Oct; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30333179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterizing parasitic nematode faunas in faeces and soil using DNA metabarcoding. Davey ML; Utaaker KS; Fossøy F Parasit Vectors; 2021 Aug; 14(1):422. PubMed ID: 34419166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments. Giroux MS; Reichman JR; Langknecht T; Burgess RM; Ho KT Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17782. PubMed ID: 36273070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of standardized bioinformatics for the analysis of fungal DNA signatures applied to sample provenance. Allwood JS; Fierer N; Dunn RR; Breen M; Reich BJ; Laber EB; Clifton J; Grantham NS; Faith SA Forensic Sci Int; 2020 May; 310():110250. PubMed ID: 32240935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]