These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37839019)
21. Establishing arthropod community composition using metabarcoding: Surprising inconsistencies between soil samples and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches. Marquina D; Esparza-Salas R; Roslin T; Ronquist F Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1516-1530. PubMed ID: 31379089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA barcoding, an effective tool for species identification: a review. Antil S; Abraham JS; Sripoorna S; Maurya S; Dagar J; Makhija S; Bhagat P; Gupta R; Sood U; Lal R; Toteja R Mol Biol Rep; 2023 Jan; 50(1):761-775. PubMed ID: 36308581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mock community experiments can inform on the reliability of eDNA metabarcoding data: a case study on marine phytoplankton. Marinchel N; Marchesini A; Nardi D; Girardi M; Casabianca S; Vernesi C; Penna A Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20164. PubMed ID: 37978238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative analysis of fish environmental DNA reveals higher sensitivity achieved through targeted sequence-based metabarcoding. McCarthy A; Rajabi H; McClenaghan B; Fahner NA; Porter E; Singer GAC; Hajibabaei M Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Apr; 23(3):581-591. PubMed ID: 36366953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries. Mahon AR; Grey EK; Jerde CL Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 36054696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Taxonomic profiling of individual nematodes isolated from copse soils using deep amplicon sequencing of four distinct regions of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene. Kenmotsu H; Uchida K; Hirose Y; Eki T PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240336. PubMed ID: 33027282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Soil DNA metabarcoding and high-throughput sequencing as a forensic tool: considerations, potential limitations and recommendations. Young JM; Austin JJ; Weyrich LS FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Feb; 93(2):. PubMed ID: 27979996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence. Young JM; Linacre A Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102393. PubMed ID: 33157385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An improved high throughput sequencing method for studying oomycete communities. Sapkota R; Nicolaisen M J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Mar; 110():33-9. PubMed ID: 25602160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative environmental RNA and DNA metabarcoding analysis of river algae and arthropods for ecological surveys and water quality assessment. Miyata K; Inoue Y; Amano Y; Nishioka T; Nagaike T; Kawaguchi T; Morita O; Yamane M; Honda H Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19828. PubMed ID: 36400924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring. Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. eDNA metabarcoding of avocado flowers: 'Hass' it got potential to survey arthropods in food production systems? Kestel JH; Bateman PW; Field DL; White NE; Lines R; Nevill P Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1540-1555. PubMed ID: 37237427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ITS1: a DNA barcode better than ITS2 in eukaryotes? Wang XC; Liu C; Huang L; Bengtsson-Palme J; Chen H; Zhang JH; Cai D; Li JQ Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 May; 15(3):573-86. PubMed ID: 25187125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition. Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Variations in terrestrial arthropod DNA metabarcoding methods recovers robust beta diversity but variable richness and site indicators. Porter TM; Morris DM; Basiliko N; Hajibabaei M; Doucet D; Bowman S; Emilson EJS; Emilson CE; Chartrand D; Wainio-Keizer K; Séguin A; Venier L Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18218. PubMed ID: 31796780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison and validation of some ITS primer pairs useful for fungal metabarcoding studies. Op De Beeck M; Lievens B; Busschaert P; Declerck S; Vangronsveld J; Colpaert JV PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e97629. PubMed ID: 24933453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sampling environmental DNA from trees and soil to detect cryptic arboreal mammals. Allen MC; Kwait R; Vastano A; Kisurin A; Zoccolo I; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Maslo B; Lockwood JL Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):180. PubMed ID: 36604526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods. Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods. Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]