These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Design and evaluation of a portable optical-based biosensor for testing whole blood prothrombin time. Yang CL; Huang SJ; Chou CW; Chiou YC; Lin KP; Tsai MS; Young KC Talanta; 2013 Nov; 116():704-11. PubMed ID: 24148464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(12):1-114. PubMed ID: 23074516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability, validity and ease of use of a portable point-of-care coagulation device in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. Lizotte A; Quessy I; Vanier MC; Martineau J; Caron S; Darveau M; Dubé A; Gilbert E; Blais N; Lalonde L J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2002 Dec; 14(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 12913406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Point-of-care coagulation monitoring: first clinical experience using a paper-based lateral flow diagnostic device. Hegener MA; Li H; Han D; Steckl AJ; Pauletti GM Biomed Microdevices; 2017 Sep; 19(3):64. PubMed ID: 28695382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the International Normalized Ratio Between a Point-of-Care Test and a Conventional Laboratory Test: the Latter Performs Better in Assessing Warfarin-induced Changes in Coagulation Factors. Kim YS; Choi JW; Song SH; Hwang HY; Sohn SH; Kim JS; Kang Y; Gu JY; Kim KH; Kim HK Ann Lab Med; 2023 Jul; 43(4):337-344. PubMed ID: 36843402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio to laboratory International Normalized Ratio in hemodialysis patients taking warfarin. Hoel RW; Albright RC; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ; Magtibay DL; Everson SL; McBane RD Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2009 Jan; 4(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 18987294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. International normalized ratio monitoring of vitamin K antagonist therapy: comparative performance of point-of-care and laboratory-derived testing. Bonar R; Mohammed S; Favaloro EJ Semin Thromb Hemost; 2015 Apr; 41(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 25839866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiplexed and simultaneous biosensing in a 3D-printed portable six-well smartphone operated electrochemiluminescence standalone point-of-care platform. Bhaiyya M; Pattnaik PK; Goel S Mikrochim Acta; 2022 Jan; 189(2):79. PubMed ID: 35094170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care tests (CoaguChek system, INRatio2 PT/INR monitor and ProTime Microcoagulation system) for the self-monitoring of the coagulation status of people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy, compared with standard UK practice: systematic review and economic evaluation. Sharma P; Scotland G; Cruickshank M; Tassie E; Fraser C; Burton C; Croal B; Ramsay CR; Brazzelli M Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jun; 19(48):1-172. PubMed ID: 26138549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A portable smartphone-based hemoglobin point-of-care testing platform for accurate anemia diagnostics. Fu Q; Qi T; Wu Z; He Y; Guan S; Luo S; Zhang Q; Luo W; Xiao W; Situ B; Zheng L Biosens Bioelectron; 2022 Dec; 217():114711. PubMed ID: 36113300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of whole blood prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) using a Laser Speckle Rheology sensor. Tripathi MM; Egawa S; Wirth AG; Tshikudi DM; Van Cott EM; Nadkarni SK Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9169. PubMed ID: 28835607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance evaluation of a new small-volume coagulation monitor: the SmartCheck INR system. Gardiner C; Longair I; Hills J; Cohen H; Mackie IJ; Machin SJ Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 129(3):500-4. PubMed ID: 18285276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and efficacy of using portable coagulation monitor for INR examination after left-sided mechanical prosthetic valve replacement. Shen Y; Zhong FX; Huang XS J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Dec; 17(1):297. PubMed ID: 36471365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital monitoring of the microchannel filling flow dynamics using a non-contactless smartphone-based nano-liter precision flow velocity meter. Xu W; Atik AY; Beker L; Ceylan Koydemir H Biosens Bioelectron; 2024 May; 252():116130. PubMed ID: 38417285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Security and cost comparison of INR self-testing and conventional hospital INR testing in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement. Chen QL; Dong L; Dong YJ; Zhao SL; Fu B; Wang YQ; Jiang H J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 10():4. PubMed ID: 25592732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Portable microfluidic and smartphone-based devices for monitoring of cardiovascular diseases at the point of care. Hu J; Cui X; Gong Y; Xu X; Gao B; Wen T; Lu TJ; Xu F Biotechnol Adv; 2016; 34(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 26898179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy assessment of consecutive test strip lots for whole blood INR point-of-care instruments: clarifying the role of frozen plasma pools. van den Besselaar AMHP; Abdoel CF; van Rijn CJJ; van der Meer FJM; Cobbaert CM Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Aug; 57(9):1349-1357. PubMed ID: 30763258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study using thrombin generation and three different INR methods in patients on Vitamin K antagonist treatment. Riva N; Vella K; Meli S; Hickey K; Zammit D; Calamatta C; Makris M; Kitchen S; Ageno W; Gatt A Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Oct; 39(5):482-488. PubMed ID: 28500649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]