These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37839590)
1. The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants. Cai F; Southworth E; Santiago S; Stephenson-Famy A; Fay E; Wang EY; Burns RN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 230(2):262.e1-262.e9. PubMed ID: 37839590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicant Experience in Communication With Residency Programs After the Introduction of Program Signaling. Schoppen Z; Morgan HK; Hammoud M; Marzano D; George K; Winkel AF J Surg Educ; 2023 Dec; 80(12):1762-1772. PubMed ID: 37633809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives of Stakeholders About an Early Result Acceptance Program to Complement the Residency Match in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Winkel AF; Morgan HK; Akingbola O; Santos-Parker K; Nelson E; Banks E; Katz NT; Bienstock JL; Marzano D; Hammoud MM JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2124158. PubMed ID: 34633427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Program Signaling in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications. Banks E; Winkel AF; Morgan HK; Connolly A; Hammoud MM; George KE Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 143(2):281-283. PubMed ID: 38033322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes. Hammoud MM; Morgan HK; George K; Ollendorff AT; Dalrymple JL; Dunleavy D; Zhu M; Banks E; Akingbola BA; Connolly A JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2355017. PubMed ID: 38324311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current Communication Practices Between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicants and Program Directors. Morgan HK; Winkel AF; George K; Strand E; Banks E; Byrne F; Marzano D; Hammoud MM JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Oct; 5(10):e2238655. PubMed ID: 36287561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stakeholder Perspectives on Limiting Residency Applications and Interviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Strand EA; Winkel AF; Marzano DA; Morgan HK; Staples H; Hammoud MM J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(2):362-369. PubMed ID: 34862152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Case for Capping Residency Interviews. Morgan HK; Winkel AF; Standiford T; Muñoz R; Strand EA; Marzano DA; Ogburn T; Major CA; Cox S; Hammoud MM J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(3):755-762. PubMed ID: 32943370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Away Rotations in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Survey of Program Directors. George KE; Litman EA; Banks E; Morgan HK; Hammoud MM; Strand E J Surg Educ; 2023 Sep; 80(9):1340-1349. PubMed ID: 37442695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postinterview communication with residency applicants: a call for clarity! Frishman GN; Matteson KA; Bienstock JL; George KE; Ogburn T; Rauk PN; Schnatz PF; Learman LA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):344-350.e1. PubMed ID: 25068562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience. Pletcher SD; Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S Acad Med; 2022 May; 97(5):664-668. PubMed ID: 34618735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetrics and gynecology applicant perceptions of residency program culture with virtual interviews: a qualitative analysis of social media posts. Jacques LH; Cowley ES; Hebgen SM; Spencer RJ; Hale CM BMC Med Educ; 2024 Mar; 24(1):252. PubMed ID: 38459487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How We Do It: Student Perspectives on Changes to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Application Process. Strand EA; Worly BL; Morgan HK; Marzano DA; Winkel AF; Bienstock J; Banks E; Katz NT; Brito LGO; Hammoud MM J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(5):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 35525780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of virtual interviewing on applicant approach to and perspective of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Match. Lewkowitz AK; Ramsey PS; Burrell D; Metz TD; Rhoades JS Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100326. PubMed ID: 33548511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stakeholder Perspectives on Standardizing the Residency Application and Interview Processes. Hammoud MM; Winkel AF; Strand EA; Worly BL; Marzano DA; Bronner BA; Forstein DA; Katz NT; Woodland MB; Morgan HK J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(4):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 33199253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distributions of Residency Interviews With the Implementation of Virtual Interviews and Standardization of Interview Offer Dates. Santos-Parker KS; Hammoud MM; Winkel AF; Marzano D; Frank S; Franz P; Morgan HK J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(5):1105-1112. PubMed ID: 35477525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interview Invitations for Otolaryngology Residency Positions Across Demographic Groups Following Implementation of Preference Signaling. Pletcher SD; Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Francis CL; Naemi B; Costa J; Dunleavy D JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e231922. PubMed ID: 36881409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mixed Signals: Navigating the Obstetrics and Gynecology Signaling Initiative. Kraus AC; Dalrymple JL; Schwartz E; Marzan G; Nelson S; Morgan HK; Hammoud MM; Young OM J Surg Educ; 2024 Apr; 81(4):525-534. PubMed ID: 38413356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-Year Interview and Match Outcomes of Otolaryngology Preference Signaling. Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Mar; 168(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 36040808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]