150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37839995)
1. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations.
Costa T; Rezende M; Sakamoto A; Bittencourt B; Dalzochio P; Loguercio AD; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 27892839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of posterior restorations over wet and dry dentin using an etch-and-rinse adhesive: A 36-month randomized clinical trial.
González CC; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Dos Santos de Castro A; Mendez-Bauer L; Dávila-Sanchez A; Aliaga-Sancho P; Gutierrez MF; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Dent Mater; 2024 Apr; 40(4):619-628. PubMed ID: 38369403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.
de Oliveira ILM; Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Perdigão J; Montes MAJR; Loguercio AD; Monteiro GQM
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103918. PubMed ID: 34879245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of Giomer and self-etch adhesive compared with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive - Results at 8 years.
Tian F; Mu H; Shi Y; Chen X; Zou X; Gao X; Wang X
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 38806383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions.
Correia AMO; Jurema ALB; Bresciani E; Caneppele TMF
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):3083-3093. PubMed ID: 36763143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Dentin Moisture in Posterior Restorations Performed with Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutierrez MF; Chemin K; Mendez-Bauer ML; Bermúdez JP; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):E91-E105. PubMed ID: 35405005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
Barceleiro MO; Lopes LS; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Matos TP; Reis A; Calixto AL; Loguercio AD
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4337-4350. PubMed ID: 35142923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dentin moisture does not influence postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutiérrez MF; Martini EC; Dreweck FD; Mendez-Bauer L; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):206-212. PubMed ID: 32794396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Performance of a "No Wait" Universal Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Two-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Oz FD; Dursun MN; Ergin E
J Adhes Dent; 2022 Aug; 24(1):313-323. PubMed ID: 35980240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A New Dual-cure Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-month Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.
de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Marins SS; Matos T; de Souza JJ; Reis A; de Oliveira Barceleiro M; Loguercio AD
Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):E255-E270. PubMed ID: 33170938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
