These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37839995)

  • 21. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
    Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a new universal adhesive applied in the "no-waiting" technique: a randomized clinical trial.
    de Almeida RAM; Lima SNL; Nassif MV; Mattos NHR; de Matos TP; de Jesus Tavarez RR; Cardenas AFM; Bandeca MC; Loguercio AD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):151-163. PubMed ID: 36068369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
    Afifi SMH; Haridy MF; Farid MR
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 31592052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofillers in posterior cavities.
    Schirrmeister JF; Huber K; Hellwig E; Hahn P
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 19841767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Durão MA; de Andrade AKM; do Prado AM; Veloso SRM; Maciel LMT; Montes MAJR; Monteiro GQM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6219-6237. PubMed ID: 33821322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial.
    Carvalho AA; Leite MM; Zago JKM; Nunes CABCM; Barata TJE; Freitas GC; Torres ÉM; Lopes LG
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):252. PubMed ID: 31752813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Marques IP; de Oliveira FBS; Souza JGS; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; França FMG; Popoff DAV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.
    Atalay C; Ozgunaltay G; Yazici AR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
    Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sonic application of one-step self-etch adhesive in composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Hass V; Cartagena AF; Matos TP; de Souza JJ; Toyotani PE; Reis A; Calixto AL; Loguercio AD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):689-698. PubMed ID: 35138027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Santiago SL; Passos VF; Vieira AH; Navarro MF; Lauris JR; Franco EB
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21203706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope.
    Heintze SD; Monreal D; Peschke A
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25893223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.