These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37839995)

  • 41. Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Correia A; Jurema A; Andrade MR; Borges A; Bresciani E; Caneppele T
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E11-E20. PubMed ID: 31794342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of a one-step, self-etch adhesive with and without an intermediary layer of a flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.
    Boeckler A; Schaller HG; Gernhardt CR
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Apr; 43(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22532941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Randomized clinical trial of five adhesive systems in occlusal restorations: One-year results.
    Vinagre A; Ramos J; Marques F; Chambino A; Messias A; Mata A
    Dent Mater J; 2020 Jun; 39(3):397-406. PubMed ID: 31969545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is the clinical performance of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth similar if restored with incremental or bulk-filling techniques? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kunz PVM; Wambier LM; Kaizer MDR; Correr GM; Reis A; Gonzaga CC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2281-2297. PubMed ID: 35031879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Gurgan S
    J Adhes Dent; 2021 Dec; 23(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 34817965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin.
    Pintado-Palomino K; de Almeida CVVB; da Motta RJG; Fortes JHP; Tirapelli C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 30218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Effect of Radiotherapy on the Marginal Adaptation of Class II Direct Resin Composite Restorations: A Micro-computed Tomography Analysis.
    Oglakci B; Burduroğlu D; Eriş AH; Mayadağlı A; Arhun N
    Oper Dent; 2022 Jan; 47(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 35226728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 25359327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
    Guney T; Yazici AR
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite for restoration of class II cavities - results after three years.
    Cieplik F; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M; Scholz KJ
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104275. PubMed ID: 36044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Five-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesive applied following different bonding techniques: A randomized multicenter clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; Matos TP; de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Reis A; Barceleiro MO; Loguercio AD
    Dent Mater; 2023 Jun; 39(6):586-594. PubMed ID: 37147235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Loguercio AD; Calazans FS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2023; 31():e20220323. PubMed ID: 36790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial.
    de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Matos TP; Souza JJ; Reis A; Barceleiro MO; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104120. PubMed ID: 35398450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: A randomized double-blind trial.
    de Paris Matos T; Perdigão J; de Paula E; Coppla F; Hass V; Scheffer RF; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Dent Mater; 2020 Nov; 36(11):1474-1485. PubMed ID: 32933775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of a two-step self-etching vs two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive and SEM margin analysis: four-year results.
    Boeckler A; Boeckler L; Eppendorf K; Schaller HG; Gernhardt CR
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec; 14(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 22724115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Follow-up of flowable resin composites performed with a universal adhesive system in non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized, controlled 24-month clinical trial.
    Kemaloğlu H; Atalayin Ozkaya C; Ergucu Z; Onal B
    Am J Dent; 2020 Feb; 33(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 32056414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Internal and marginal adaptation of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites in class II cavities placed with different adhesive strategies.
    Haak R; Näke T; Park KJ; Ziebolz D; Krause F; Schneider H
    Odontology; 2019 Jul; 107(3):374-382. PubMed ID: 30569286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Hickel R
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 20157663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive with additional enamel etching in Class III cavities.
    Ermis RB; Temel UB; Cellik EU; Kam O
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20420057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.