These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37840099)

  • 21. A Nomogram for Enhancing the Diagnostic Effectiveness of Solid Breast BI-RADS 3-5 Masses to Determine Malignancy Based on Imaging Aspects of Conventional Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
    Yan M; Peng C; He D; Xu D; Yang C
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Oct; 23(7):693-703. PubMed ID: 37394416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis in screening breast ultrasound to reduce false-positive diagnoses.
    Kim S-; Choi Y; Kim E-; Han BK; Yoon JH; Choi JS; Chang JM
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):395. PubMed ID: 33432076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
    Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Photoacoustic Imaging Radiomics to Identify Breast Cancer in BI-RADS 4 or 5 Lesions.
    Li G; Huang Z; Luo H; Tian H; Ding Z; Deng Y; Xu J; Wu H; Dong F
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Jul; 24(5):e379-e388.e1. PubMed ID: 38548517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies for mammographic BI-RADS 4 lesions through a deep transfer learning method.
    Meng M; Li H; Zhang M; He G; Wang L; Shen D
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):82. PubMed ID: 37312026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.
    Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
    Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.
    Yi C; Tang Y; Ouyang R; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yang Z; Wu S; Han M; Xiao J; Chang P; Ma J
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1528-1537. PubMed ID: 34528107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammography-based radiomic analysis for predicting benign BI-RADS category 4 calcifications.
    Lei C; Wei W; Liu Z; Xiong Q; Yang C; Yang M; Zhang L; Zhu T; Zhuang X; Liu C; Liu Z; Tian J; Wang K
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108711. PubMed ID: 31677544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
    Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.
    Berg WA; Berg JM; Sickles EA; Burnside ES; Zuley ML; Rosenberg RD; Lee CS
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32427557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Deep Learning-Based Decision Support Tool for Precision Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer.
    He T; Puppala M; Ezeana CF; Huang YS; Chou PH; Yu X; Chen S; Wang L; Yin Z; Danforth RL; Ensor J; Chang J; Patel T; Wong STC
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 May; 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 31141423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement.
    Rawashdeh M; Lewis S; Zaitoun M; Brennan P
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():294-298. PubMed ID: 29673997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ultrasound-Based Nomogram for Distinguishing Malignant Tumors from Nodular Sclerosing Adenoses in Solid Breast Lesions.
    Liang T; Cong S; Yi Z; Liu J; Huang C; Shen J; Pei S; Chen G; Liu Z
    J Ultrasound Med; 2021 Oct; 40(10):2189-2200. PubMed ID: 33438775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Non-mass lesions detected by breast US: stratification of cancer risk for clinical management.
    Park KW; Park S; Shon I; Kim MJ; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Shin JH; Kwon MR; Choi JS
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1693-1706. PubMed ID: 32888070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining Potential Strain Elastography and Radiomics for Diagnosing Breast Lesions in BI-RADS 4: Construction and Validation a Predictive Nomogram.
    Zha H; Wu T; Zhang M; Cai M; Diao X; Li F; Wu R; Du Y
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Aug; 31(8):3106-3116. PubMed ID: 38378324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prospective assessment of adjunctive ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography in women undergoing breast biopsy: Impact on BI-RADS assessments.
    Poplack SP; Young CA; Hagemann IS; Luo J; Herman CR; Wiele K; Li S; Zeng Y; Covington MF; Zhu Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 145():110029. PubMed ID: 34801874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Deep Learning Decision Support Tool to Improve Risk Stratification and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Mammograms.
    Ezeana CF; He T; Patel TA; Kaklamani V; Elmi M; Brigmon E; Otto PM; Kist KA; Speck H; Wang L; Ensor J; Shih YT; Kim B; Pan IW; Cohen AL; Kelley K; Spak D; Yang WT; Chang JC; Wong STC
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2023 Nov; 5(6):e220259. PubMed ID: 38074778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.