186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37840636)
1. Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer.
Makieva S; Sachs MK; Xie M; Velasco A; El-Hadad S; Kalaitzopoulos DR; Dedes I; Stiller R; Leeners B
Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(4):hoad037. PubMed ID: 37840636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children.
De Vos A; Van Landuyt L; De Rycke M; Verdyck P; Verheyen G; Buysse A; Belva F; Keymolen K; Tournaye H; Verpoest W
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2488-2496. PubMed ID: 33047114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study.
Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Alviggi E; Sansone A; Trabucco E; Dusi L; Buffo L; Barnocchi N; Fiorini F; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Argento C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32951051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience.
Cimadomo D; Rienzi L; Romanelli V; Alviggi E; Levi-Setti PE; Albani E; Dusi L; Papini L; Livi C; Benini F; Smeraldi A; Patassini C; Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A
Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1839-1846. PubMed ID: 30239718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts.
Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency and efficacy of vitrification in 35 654 sibling oocytes from donation cycles.
Cornet-Bartolomé D; Rodriguez A; García D; Barragán M; Vassena R
Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2262-2271. PubMed ID: 32856058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
An BGL; Chapman M; Tilia L; Venetis C
Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing.
Cimadomo D; Soscia D; Vaiarelli A; Maggiulli R; Capalbo A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 31247100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective study.
De Croo I; Colman R; De Sutter P; Stoop D; Tilleman K
Hum Reprod Open; 2022; 2022(3):hoac031. PubMed ID: 35919767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycle.
De Vos A; Van Landuyt L; Santos-Ribeiro S; Camus M; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2442-2449. PubMed ID: 27619768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.
Theodorou E; Jones BP; Cardenas Armas DF; Heath C; Serhal P; Ben-Nagi J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Apr; 39(4):987-993. PubMed ID: 35217947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
Bourdon M; Pocate-Cheriet K; Finet de Bantel A; Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Amar Hoffet A; Arbo E; Poulain M; Santulli P
Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1948-1964. PubMed ID: 31644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A stepwise approach to move from a cleavage-stage to a blastocyst-stage transfer policy for all patients in the IVF clinic.
De Croo I; De Sutter P; Tilleman K
Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(3):hoaa034. PubMed ID: 32995561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
