These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37841437)

  • 1. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison between conventional and hypofractionated breast treatment plans using the Halcyon system.
    Tai DT; Phat LT; Ngoc Anh N; Sang HVT; Loc TM; Hai NX; Sandwall PA; Bradley D; Chow JCL
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1259416. PubMed ID: 37841437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
    Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiobiological impact of planning techniques for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability.
    Rana S; Cheng C
    Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2014 Mar; 4(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 24761232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voxel-Level BED Corrected Dosimetric and Radiobiological Assessment of 2 Kinds of Hybrid Radiotherapy Planning Methods for Stage III NSCLC.
    Wang H; Huang Y; Chen H; Shao Y; Duan Y; Feng A; Gu H; Ma X; Xu Z; Kong Q; Zhou Y
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221107966. PubMed ID: 35731648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of prostate VMAT plans optimized using the photon and progressive resolution algorithm.
    Chow JCL; Jiang R; Xu L
    Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 31103251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a Hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique with non-coplanar VMAT and non-coplanar IMRT for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma using the RayStation treatment planning system-EUD, NTCP and planning study.
    Raturi VP; Motegi A; Zenda S; Nakamura N; Hojo H; Kageyama SI; Okumura M; Rachi T; Ohyoshi H; Tachibana H; Motegi K; Ariji T; Nakamura M; Hirano Y; Hirata H; Akimoto T
    J Radiat Res; 2021 May; 62(3):540-548. PubMed ID: 33839761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of an indigenous, radiobiological model-based tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability estimation software for routine plan evaluation in clinics.
    Patel G; Mandal A; Bharati A; Choudhary S; Mishra R; Mourya A
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(6):1697-1705. PubMed ID: 36412432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the NTCP modeling on medical decision to select eligible patient for proton therapy: the usefulness of EUD as an indicator to rank modern photon vs proton treatment plans.
    Chaikh A; Calugaru V; Bondiau PY; Thariat J; Balosso J
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Sep; 94(9):789-797. PubMed ID: 29878849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associating dose-volume characteristics with theoretical radiobiological metrics for rapid Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery plan evaluation.
    Tien CJ; Bond JE; Chen ZJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 21(10):132-140. PubMed ID: 32910543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of SBRT fractionation on TCP and NTCP estimations for prostate cancer.
    Sukhikh ES; Sukhikh LG; Taletsky AV; Vertinsky AV; Izhevsky PV; Sheino IN
    Phys Med; 2019 Jun; 62():41-46. PubMed ID: 31153397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating different radiotherapy treatment plans, in terms of critical organ scoring index, conformity index, tumor control probability, and normal tissue complication probability calculations in early glottic larynx carcinoma.
    Inal A; Duman E; Ozkan EE
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(3):485-493. PubMed ID: 32719255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetric comparison between VMAT plans using the fast-rotating O-ring linac with dual-layer stacked MLC and helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Ju SG; Ahn YC; Kim YB; Kim JM; Kwon DY; Park BS; Yang K
    Radiat Oncol; 2022 Sep; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 36096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in head-and-neck radiotherapy using JO-IMRT and 3D-CRT.
    Tai DT; Oanh LT; Phuong PH; Sulieman A; Abolaban FA; Omer H; Chow JCL
    Saudi J Biol Sci; 2022 Aug; 29(8):103336. PubMed ID: 35754762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Urethra Sparing on Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability in Focal Dose Escalated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: A Planning Study Based on Histopathology Reference.
    Spohn SKB; Sachpazidis I; Wiehle R; Thomann B; Sigle A; Bronsert P; Ruf J; Benndorf M; Nicolay NH; Sprave T; Grosu AL; Baltas D; Zamboglou C
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():652678. PubMed ID: 34055621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of esophageal cancer treatment methods from 3D-CRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc plans using custom Python software to compare radiobiological plans to normal tissue integral dosage.
    Dashnamoorthy S; Jeyasingh E; Rajamanickam K
    Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2023; 28(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 37122909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for locally advanced gynecological cancer: radiobiological and dosimetric considerations.
    Guerrero M; Li XA; Ma L; Linder J; Deyoung C; Erickson B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(3):933-9. PubMed ID: 15936580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
    Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans.
    Liang X; Penagaricano J; Zheng D; Morrill S; Zhang X; Corry P; Griffin RJ; Han EY; Hardee M; Ratanatharathom V
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26800883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.
    Zeng C; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Goldberg S; Niemierko A; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Trofimov A
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051708. PubMed ID: 23635256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benchmarking halcyon ring delivery system for hypofractionated breast radiotherapy: Validation and clinical implementation of the fast-forward trial.
    Pokhrel D; Smith M; Volk A; Bernard ME
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 24(9):e14047. PubMed ID: 37221949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.