These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3784145)

  • 1. Clinical application of time-dependent perimetry: 1. Results in normal subjects.
    Yasuma T; Miyakawa N; Yamazaki J
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1986; 30(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 3784145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical application of time dependent perimetry (9). The relations between stimulus area and double flash resolution, and critical flicker frequency].
    Yamamoto N; Yasuma T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 93(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 2801344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?
    Yoshiyama KK; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Oct; 38(11):2270-7. PubMed ID: 9344350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Threshold-adjusted supraliminal pattern perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter].
    Fischer FW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 185(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 6492677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical applications of time-dependent perimetry (10) receptive field properties of glaucoma patients].
    Nagasaka T; Yasuma T; Awaya S
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Feb; 101(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 9124101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Light perception and flicker perimetry. Effect of refractive error, artificial media opacities and pupillary size].
    Gleissner M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr; 89(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1600326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Properties of the regained visual field after visual detection training of hemianopsia patients.
    Bergsma DP; Van der Wildt GJ
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):365-75. PubMed ID: 18997312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The black hole effect in perimetry.
    Britt JM; Mills RP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 May; 29(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 3366568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical applications of time-dependent perimetry (7). Mechanisms of DFR and CFF].
    Yasuma T; Yamamoto N; Yamazaki J; Nagasaka T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Apr; 92(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 3407559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Critical flicker frequency (CFF) in the central and peripheral visual field (author's transl)].
    Grounauer PA; Toi VV
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1976 Jan; 168(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 979037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Flicker perimetry (CFF) in glaucoma diagnosis].
    Dudziński A; Zawojska I; Kinasz R
    Klin Oczna; 2003; 105(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 14746180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupil perimetry using M-sequence stimulation technique.
    Wilhelm H; Neitzel J; Wilhelm B; Beuel S; Lüdtke H; Kretschmann U; Zrenner E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Apr; 41(5):1229-38. PubMed ID: 10752964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meridional differences in temporal response characteristics.
    Styles T; Flanagan JG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Oct; 9(4):405-10. PubMed ID: 2631007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
    Bengtsson B; Hellgren KJ; Agardh E
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.
    Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of flicker rate on nasal and temporal measured visual field extent in infants.
    Delaney SM; Dobson V; Mohan KM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):922-8. PubMed ID: 15592116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.