These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37842065)

  • 1. Persisting roadblocks in arthropod monitoring using non-destructive metabarcoding from collection media of passive traps.
    Sire L; Schmidt Yáñez P; Bézier A; Courtial B; Mbedi S; Sparmann S; Larrieu L; Rougerie R; Bouget C; Monaghan MT; Herniou EA; Lopez-Vaamonde C
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16022. PubMed ID: 37842065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing arthropod community composition using metabarcoding: Surprising inconsistencies between soil samples and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches.
    Marquina D; Esparza-Salas R; Roslin T; Ronquist F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1516-1530. PubMed ID: 31379089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of destructive and nondestructive DNA extraction methods for the metabarcoding of arthropod bulk samples.
    Kirse A; Bourlat SJ; Langen K; Zapke B; Zizka VMA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 35932285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metabarcoding Malaise traps and soil eDNA reveals seasonal and local arthropod diversity shifts.
    Kirse A; Bourlat SJ; Langen K; Fonseca VG
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10498. PubMed ID: 34006991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring in a national park: Screening for invasive and pest species.
    Hardulak LA; Morinière J; Hausmann A; Hendrich L; Schmidt S; Doczkal D; Müller J; Hebert PDN; Haszprunar G
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Nov; 20(6):1542-1557. PubMed ID: 32559020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of traditional and DNA metabarcoding samples for monitoring tropical soil arthropods (Formicidae, Collembola and Isoptera).
    Basset Y; Hajibabaei M; Wright MTG; Castillo AM; Donoso DA; Segar ST; Souto-Vilarós D; Soliman DY; Roslin T; Smith MA; Lamarre GPA; De León LF; Decaëns T; Palacios-Vargas JG; Castaño-Meneses G; Scheffrahn RH; Rivera M; Perez F; Bobadilla R; Lopez Y; Ramirez Silva JA; Cruz MM; Galván AA; Barrios H
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10762. PubMed ID: 35750774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biodiversity assessments in the 21st century: the potential of insect traps to complement environmental samples for estimating eukaryotic and prokaryotic diversity using high-throughput DNA metabarcoding
    Ritter CD; Häggqvist S; Karlsson D; Sääksjärvi IE; Muasya AM; Nilsson RH; Antonelli A
    Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):147-159. PubMed ID: 30673361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the biodiversity of terrestrial invertebrates on a forested island using DNA barcodes and metabarcoding data.
    Dopheide A; Tooman LK; Grosser S; Agabiti B; Rhode B; Xie D; Stevens MI; Nelson N; Buckley TR; Drummond AJ; Newcomb RD
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01877. PubMed ID: 30811075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variations in terrestrial arthropod DNA metabarcoding methods recovers robust beta diversity but variable richness and site indicators.
    Porter TM; Morris DM; Basiliko N; Hajibabaei M; Doucet D; Bowman S; Emilson EJS; Emilson CE; Chartrand D; Wainio-Keizer K; Séguin A; Venier L
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18218. PubMed ID: 31796780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A DNA barcode library for 5,200 German flies and midges (Insecta: Diptera) and its implications for metabarcoding-based biomonitoring.
    Morinière J; Balke M; Doczkal D; Geiger MF; Hardulak LA; Haszprunar G; Hausmann A; Hendrich L; Regalado L; Rulik B; Schmidt S; Wägele JW; Hebert PDN
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):900-928. PubMed ID: 30977972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines.
    Brandon-Mong GJ; Gan HM; Sing KW; Lee PS; Lim PE; Wilson JJ
    Bull Entomol Res; 2015 Dec; 105(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 26344799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. eDNA metabarcoding of avocado flowers: 'Hass' it got potential to survey arthropods in food production systems?
    Kestel JH; Bateman PW; Field DL; White NE; Lines R; Nevill P
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1540-1555. PubMed ID: 37237427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing insect biodiversity with automatic light traps in Brazil: Pearls and pitfalls of metabarcoding samples in preservative ethanol.
    Zenker MM; Specht A; Fonseca VG
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 10(5):2352-2366. PubMed ID: 32184986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher-preserving biodiversity assessment method
    Zizka VMA; Leese F; Peinert B; Geiger MF
    Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):122-136. PubMed ID: 30457888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expedited assessment of terrestrial arthropod diversity by coupling Malaise traps with DNA barcoding
    deWaard JR; Levesque-Beaudin V; deWaard SL; Ivanova NV; McKeown JTA; Miskie R; Naik S; Perez KHJ; Ratnasingham S; Sobel CN; Sones JE; Steinke C; Telfer AC; Young AD; Young MR; Zakharov EV; Hebert PDN
    Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):85-95. PubMed ID: 30257096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
    Elbrecht V; Leese F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FAVIS: Fast and versatile protocol for non-destructive metabarcoding of bulk insect samples.
    Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht E; Łukasik P; Buczek M; Deng J; Hartop EA; Havnås H; Prus-Frankowska M; Ugarph CR; Viteri P; Andersson AF; Roslin T; Tack AJM; Ronquist F; Miraldo A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0286272. PubMed ID: 37467453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metabarcoding reveals that mixed forests mitigate negative effects of non-native trees on canopy arthropod diversity.
    Wildermuth B; Seifert CL; Husemann M; Schuldt A
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Dec; 33(8):e2921. PubMed ID: 37776039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing arthropod biodiversity with DNA barcoding in Jinnah Garden, Lahore, Pakistan.
    Samreen KB; Manzoor F
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17420. PubMed ID: 38832046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-destructive collection and metabarcoding of arthropod environmental DNA remained on a terrestrial plant.
    Yoneya K; Ushio M; Miki T
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):7125. PubMed ID: 37173307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.