These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37842069)

  • 1. Repeated response execution and inhibition alter subjective preferences but do not affect automatic approach and avoidance tendencies toward an object.
    Matsuda I; Nittono H
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16275. PubMed ID: 37842069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of reward-related response tendencies in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Asci O; Braem S; Park HRP; Boehler CN; Krebs RM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 19(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30788804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Devaluation of NoGo stimuli is both robust and fragile.
    Liu H; Holland RW; Blechert J; Quandt J; Veling H
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Aug; 36(5):876-893. PubMed ID: 35467479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To respond or not to respond? A model-based comparison between the processing of go, nogo, and neutral stimuli.
    Wühr P; Heuer H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):525-549. PubMed ID: 32162965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain dynamics underlying training-induced improvement in suppressing inappropriate action.
    Manuel AL; Grivel J; Bernasconi F; Murray MM; Spierer L
    J Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 30(41):13670-8. PubMed ID: 20943907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.
    Johnstone SJ; Dimoska A; Smith JL; Barry RJ; Pleffer CB; Chiswick D; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 16919346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related differences in transfer costs: evidence from go/nogo tasks.
    Vallesi A; Hasher L; Stuss DT
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):963-7. PubMed ID: 20718536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus Reward Value Interacts with Training-induced Plasticity in Inhibitory Control.
    De Pretto M; Hartmann L; Garcia-Burgos D; Sallard E; Spierer L
    Neuroscience; 2019 Nov; 421():82-94. PubMed ID: 31705887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Reaction Switching Produces A Greater Bias to Prepotent Response than Reaction Inhibition.
    Fadeev K; Alikovskaia T; Tumyalis A; Smirnov A; Golokhvast K
    Brain Sci; 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32213960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks.
    Phaf RH; Mohr SE; Rotteveel M; Wicherts JM
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():378. PubMed ID: 24847292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The social Simon effect in the tactile sensory modality: a negative finding.
    Pérusseau-Lambert A; Anastassova M; Boukallel M; Chetouani M; Grynszpan O
    Cogn Process; 2019 Aug; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 30993409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disentangling specific inhibitory versus general decision-making processes during sleep deprivation using a Go/NoGo ERP paradigm.
    Gosselin A; De Koninck J; Campbell KB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():18-27. PubMed ID: 31022412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task.
    Jones S; Paul ES; Dayan P; Robinson ESJ; Mendl M
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 331():214-224. PubMed ID: 28549647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.
    Dolk T; Liepelt R
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2011. PubMed ID: 30410459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Support from a TMS/MEP study for a direct link between positive/negative stimuli and approach/avoidance tendencies.
    Fini C; Fischer M; Bardi L; Brass M; Moors A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jun; 143():107496. PubMed ID: 32407905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modification of food preferences by posthypnotic suggestions: An event-related brain potential study.
    Zahedi A; Łuczak A; Sommer W
    Appetite; 2020 Aug; 151():104713. PubMed ID: 32302724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unpleasant stimuli differentially modulate inhibitory processes in an emotional Go/NoGo task: an event-related potential study.
    Buodo G; Sarlo M; Mento G; Messerotti Benvenuti S; Palomba D
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Jan; 31(1):127-138. PubMed ID: 26403599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.