These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3784235)

  • 1. Peer review--a risk analysis.
    Stratton WT
    Kans Med; 1986 Nov; 87(11):313-4, 318. PubMed ID: 3784235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical malpractice legislation: Kansas.
    Wedel KD
    J Kans Med Soc; 1984 Dec; 85(12):344-50. PubMed ID: 6520538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The medical malpractice crisis: a comparative empirical perspective.
    Dewees DN; Trebilcock MJ; Coyte PC
    Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Winter 217-51. PubMed ID: 10114982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symposium: health science liability. Law and medicine: conflict or cooperation?
    Grove AS
    Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1972; 76(3):714-7. PubMed ID: 4667680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: what you can do to avoid lawsuits.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Dec; 31(12):166, 171. PubMed ID: 17153327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A different perspective.
    Neighbor EH
    J Kans Med Soc; 1984 Dec; 85(12):337-9. PubMed ID: 6520536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical malpractice: can peer review be prophylactic?
    Mecca MA
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1986 Jul; 21(7):13-4. PubMed ID: 3088006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
    Stevens M
    Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The National Practitioner Data Bank: a step toward more effective peer review.
    Hackney VH
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jul; 24(7):201-9, 219. PubMed ID: 10111631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolving role of the American College of Surgeons in peer review and the PSRO legislation.
    Dunlop GR
    R I Med J; 1973 Aug; 56(8):329-32. PubMed ID: 4516956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk control.
    Schropp ML
    Group Pract; 1975; 24(5):8-11, 28. PubMed ID: 10237473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review protection act does what title says.
    Pa Med; 1975 Jan; 78(1):17. PubMed ID: 1128897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review update--new tools and requirements.
    Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1987 Sep; 83(9 Pt 1):87-9. PubMed ID: 3672399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Massive peer review program required by congress.
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 1973 Jan; 66(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 4687476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Courts reach different results interpreting peer review privilege statutes.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1991 May; 8(7):3-5. PubMed ID: 10111230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer group review, an educational experience.
    Skipper JK; Mulligan JL; Garg ML; McNamara MJ
    Ohio State Med J; 1974 Aug; 70(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 4858610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What it is like to be involved as a peer in the Medical Practice Act.
    Curry LE
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1976 Jan; 65(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 1245804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Connecticut's Peer Review Immunity Statute: a legislative history of P.A. 76-413.
    Brunell RJ
    Conn Med; 1979 Sep; 43(9):571-2, 575. PubMed ID: 519988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review.
    Phillippi FM
    J Med Assoc State Ala; 1972 Sep; 42(3):151-2. PubMed ID: 5070861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The privilege of peer review.
    Overlock ME
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1990 Nov; 83(11):563-5. PubMed ID: 2280592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.