These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37843038)

  • 21. Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
    Mallick DB; Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The noisy encoding of disparity model predicts perception of the McGurk effect in native Japanese speakers.
    Magnotti JF; Lado A; Beauchamp MS
    Front Neurosci; 2024; 18():1421713. PubMed ID: 38988770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How prior expectations shape multisensory perception.
    Gau R; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):876-886. PubMed ID: 26419391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neural correlates of interindividual differences in children's audiovisual speech perception.
    Nath AR; Fava EE; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 31(39):13963-71. PubMed ID: 21957257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Audio-visual speech perception in noise: Implanted children and young adults versus normal hearing peers.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Fostick L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 92():146-150. PubMed ID: 28012517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combining Behavioral and ERP Methodologies to Investigate the Differences Between McGurk Effects Demonstrated by Cantonese and Mandarin Speakers.
    Zhang J; Meng Y; McBride C; Fan X; Yuan Z
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():181. PubMed ID: 29780312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Audio-visual integration in noise: Influence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect.
    Stacey JE; Howard CJ; Mitra S; Stacey PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3544-3557. PubMed ID: 32533526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
    Van Engen KJ; Dey A; Sommers MS; Peelle JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
    Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gaze behavior in audiovisual speech perception: the influence of ocular fixations on the McGurk effect.
    Paré M; Richler RC; ten Hove M; Munhall KG
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 12812278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integration of heard and seen speech: a factor in learning disabilities in children.
    Hayes EA; Tiippana K; Nicol TG; Sams M; Kraus N
    Neurosci Lett; 2003 Nov; 351(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 14550910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cross-modal Association between Auditory and Visuospatial Information in Mandarin Tone Perception in Noise by Native and Non-native Perceivers.
    Hannah B; Wang Y; Jongman A; Sereno JA; Cao J; Nie Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2051. PubMed ID: 29255435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Audio-visual speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.
    Yamamoto R; Naito Y; Tona R; Moroto S; Tamaya R; Fujiwara K; Shinohara S; Takebayashi S; Kikuchi M; Michida T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():160-168. PubMed ID: 29106867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influences of selective adaptation on perception of audiovisual speech.
    Dias JW; Cook TC; Rosenblum LD
    J Phon; 2016 May; 56():75-84. PubMed ID: 27041781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction across sensory modalities: A neurocomputational model of the McGurk effect.
    Olasagasti I; Bouton S; Giraud AL
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():61-75. PubMed ID: 26009260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Face-viewing patterns predict audiovisual speech integration in autistic children.
    Feng S; Lu H; Wang Q; Li T; Fang J; Chen L; Yi L
    Autism Res; 2021 Dec; 14(12):2592-2602. PubMed ID: 34415113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion.
    Nath AR; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):781-7. PubMed ID: 21787869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Audio-visual integration during speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children revealed by the McGurk effect.
    Tona R; Naito Y; Moroto S; Yamamoto R; Fujiwara K; Yamazaki H; Shinohara S; Kikuchi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2072-8. PubMed ID: 26455920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.