BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37843505)

  • 1. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
    Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-laboratory comparison of three earplug fit-test systems.
    Byrne DC; Murphy WJ; Krieg EF; Ghent RM; Michael KL; Stefanson EW; Ahroon WA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Apr; 14(4):294-305. PubMed ID: 27786602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How hearing conservation training format impacts personal attenuation ratings in U.S. Marine Corps Training Recruits.
    Federman J; Karch SJ; Duhon C
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 32924674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving Hearing Protection Device Noise Attenuation Through Fit-Testing in an Occupational Health Clinic.
    Hayes ME; Hammond S; Montgomery AP; Stephenson L
    Workplace Health Saf; 2022 Apr; 70(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 35353017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Earplugs in Preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in an Auto Parts Factory in China.
    Gong W; Zhao L; Li L; Morata TC; Qiu W; Feng HA; Zhu B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34281127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual fit testing of hearing protection devices.
    Voix J; Hager LD
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 19534854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Study on the fit testing for the workers wearing hearing protection device in machinery manufacturing enterprises].
    Wang YN; Su SB; Liao CH; Zhong X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Jan; 42(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 38311944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using a boothless audiometer to estimate personal attenuation rating in a military hearing conservation clinic.
    Kulinski D; Brungart DS
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Apr; 2(4):043601. PubMed ID: 36154227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
    Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.
    Murphy WJ; Themann CL; Murata TK
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):688-98. PubMed ID: 27414471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
    Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The viability of hearing protection device fit-testing at navy and marine corps accession points.
    Federman J; Duhon C
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):303-311. PubMed ID: 27991461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R; Morzynski L; Swidzinski A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.