BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37844077)

  • 1. Batch normalization followed by merging is powerful for phenotype prediction integrating multiple heterogeneous studies.
    Gao Y; Sun F
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Oct; 19(10):e1010608. PubMed ID: 37844077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustifying genomic classifiers to batch effects via ensemble learning.
    Zhang Y; Patil P; Johnson WE; Parmigiani G
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(11):1521-1527. PubMed ID: 33245114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using machine learning to realize genetic site screening and genomic prediction of productive traits in pigs.
    Xiang T; Li T; Li J; Li X; Wang J
    FASEB J; 2023 Jun; 37(6):e22961. PubMed ID: 37178007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EMLI-ICC: an ensemble machine learning-based integration algorithm for metastasis prediction and risk stratification in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Ruan J; Xu S; Chen R; Qu W; Li Q; Ye C; Wu W; Jiang Q; Yan F; Shen E; Chu Q; Jia Y; Zhang X; Fu W; Chen J; Timko MP; Zhao P; Fan L; Shen Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Nov; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36259363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard machine learning approaches outperform deep representation learning on phenotype prediction from transcriptomics data.
    Smith AM; Walsh JR; Long J; Davis CB; Henstock P; Hodge MR; Maciejewski M; Mu XJ; Ra S; Zhao S; Ziemek D; Fisher CK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):119. PubMed ID: 32197580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of normalization methods for predicting quantitative phenotypes in metagenomic data analysis.
    Wang B; Luan Y
    Front Genet; 2024; 15():1369628. PubMed ID: 38903761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods and variable selection methods for predicting difficult-to-measure traits in Holstein dairy cattle using milk infrared spectral data.
    Mota LFM; Pegolo S; Baba T; Peñagaricano F; Morota G; Bittante G; Cecchinato A
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):8107-8121. PubMed ID: 33865589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking Parametric and Machine Learning Models for Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits.
    Azodi CB; Bolger E; McCarren A; Roantree M; de Los Campos G; Shiu SH
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Nov; 9(11):3691-3702. PubMed ID: 31533955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease for Patients With Hypertension From Electronic Health Records With Big Data and Machine-Learning Methods: Model Development and Performance Evaluation.
    Du Z; Yang Y; Zheng J; Li Q; Lin D; Li Y; Fan J; Cheng W; Chen XH; Cai Y
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17257. PubMed ID: 32628616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNNGP, a deep neural network-based method for genomic prediction using multi-omics data in plants.
    Wang K; Abid MA; Rasheed A; Crossa J; Hearne S; Li H
    Mol Plant; 2023 Jan; 16(1):279-293. PubMed ID: 36366781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction using machine learning: a comparison of the performance of regularized regression, ensemble, instance-based and deep learning methods on synthetic and empirical data.
    Lourenço VM; Ogutu JO; Rodrigues RAP; Posekany A; Piepho HP
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):152. PubMed ID: 38326768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
    Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementation of ensemble machine learning algorithms on exome datasets for predicting early diagnosis of cancers.
    Pasha Syed AR; Anbalagan R; Setlur AS; Karunakaran C; Shetty J; Kumar J; Niranjan V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):496. PubMed ID: 36401182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time milk analysis integrated with stacking ensemble learning as a tool for the daily prediction of cheese-making traits in Holstein cattle.
    Mota LFM; Giannuzzi D; Bisutti V; Pegolo S; Trevisi E; Schiavon S; Gallo L; Fineboym D; Katz G; Cecchinato A
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 May; 105(5):4237-4255. PubMed ID: 35282909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep Ensemble Learning Approaches in Healthcare to Enhance the Prediction and Diagnosing Performance: The Workflows, Deployments, and Surveys on the Statistical, Image-Based, and Sequential Datasets.
    Nguyen DK; Lan CH; Chan CL
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ensemble machine learning model trained on a new synthesized dataset generalizes well for stress prediction using wearable devices.
    Vos G; Trinh K; Sarnyai Z; Rahimi Azghadi M
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Dec; 148():104556. PubMed ID: 38048895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of signal intensity normalization of MRI on the generalizability of radiomic-based prediction of molecular glioma subtypes.
    Foltyn-Dumitru M; Schell M; Rastogi A; Sahm F; Kessler T; Wick W; Bendszus M; Brugnara G; Vollmuth P
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2782-2790. PubMed ID: 37672053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An intelligent warning model for early prediction of cardiac arrest in sepsis patients.
    Layeghian Javan S; Sepehri MM; Layeghian Javan M; Khatibi T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Sep; 178():47-58. PubMed ID: 31416562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DeepProg: an ensemble of deep-learning and machine-learning models for prognosis prediction using multi-omics data.
    Poirion OB; Jing Z; Chaudhary K; Huang S; Garmire LX
    Genome Med; 2021 Jul; 13(1):112. PubMed ID: 34261540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of tumor types using XGBoost machine learning model: a vector space transformation of genomic alterations.
    Zelli V; Manno A; Compagnoni C; Ibraheem RO; Zazzeroni F; Alesse E; Rossi F; Arbib C; Tessitore A
    J Transl Med; 2023 Nov; 21(1):836. PubMed ID: 37990214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.