161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847431)
1. The impact of facility type and volume on treatment and overall survival in craniopharyngioma.
Bitner BF; Liu DH; Nottoli MM; Torabi SJ; Hsu FPK; Kuan EC
Pituitary; 2023 Dec; 26(6):686-695. PubMed ID: 37847431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patterns of care and treatment outcomes of patients with Craniopharyngioma in the national cancer database.
Rao YJ; Hassanzadeh C; Fischer-Valuck B; Chicoine MR; Kim AH; Perkins SM; Huang J
J Neurooncol; 2017 Mar; 132(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 28012064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic versus Nonendoscopic Surgery for Resection of Craniopharyngiomas.
Abiri A; Roman KM; Latif K; Goshtasbi K; Torabi SJ; Lehrich BM; Mohyeldin A; Hsu FPK; Kuan EC
World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e629-e638. PubMed ID: 36041722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors associated with the surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in pediatric patients: analysis of 1961 patients from a national registry database.
Bakhsheshian J; Jin DL; Chang KE; Strickland BA; Donoho DA; Cen S; Mack WJ; Attenello F; Christian EA; Zada G
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Dec; 41(6):E8. PubMed ID: 27903117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Factors and Treatment Impact on Overall Survival in Adult Craniopharyngioma.
Awad M; Butterfield JT; Dhawan S; Tyler MA; Venteicher AS
World Neurosurg; 2023 May; 173():e132-e139. PubMed ID: 36773809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Treatment at a High-volume Center Associated with an Improved Survival for Primary Malignant Bone Tumors?
Malik AT; Alexander JH; Khan SN; Scharschmidt TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Mar; 478(3):631-642. PubMed ID: 31714413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of facility volume on survival in primary endoscopic surgery for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.
Bitner BF; Huck NA; Khosravi P; Torabi SJ; Abello EH; Goshtasbi K; Kuan EC
Am J Otolaryngol; 2024; 45(2):104133. PubMed ID: 38039908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient choice for high-volume center radiation impacts head and neck cancer outcome.
Naghavi AO; Echevarria MI; Strom TJ; Abuodeh YA; Venkat PS; Ahmed KA; Demetriou S; Frakes JM; Kim Y; Kish JA; Russell JS; Otto KJ; Chung CH; Harrison LB; Trotti A; Caudell JJ
Cancer Med; 2018 Oct; 7(10):4964-4979. PubMed ID: 30175512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics and overall survival in pediatric versus adult craniopharyngioma: a population-based study.
Lehrich BM; Goshtasbi K; Hsu FPK; Kuan EC
Childs Nerv Syst; 2021 May; 37(5):1535-1545. PubMed ID: 33641032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved survival of glioblastoma patients treated at academic and high-volume facilities: a hospital-based study from the National Cancer Database.
Zhu P; Du XL; Zhu JJ; Esquenazi Y
J Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 132(2):491-502. PubMed ID: 30771780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma: the importance of the relationship between pituitary stalk and tumor.
Dho YS; Kim YH; Se YB; Han DH; Kim JH; Park CK; Wang KC; Kim DG
J Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 129(3):611-619. PubMed ID: 28960155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endonasal endoscopic reoperation for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas.
Dhandapani S; Singh H; Negm HM; Cohen S; Souweidane MM; Greenfield JP; Anand VK; Schwartz TH
J Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 126(2):418-430. PubMed ID: 27153172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes in transcranial microsurgery versus extended endoscopic endonasal approach for primary resection of adult craniopharyngiomas.
Wannemuehler TJ; Rubel KE; Hendricks BK; Ting JY; Payner TD; Shah MV; Cohen-Gadol AA
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Dec; 41(6):E6. PubMed ID: 27903125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngiomas: surgical outcome in 64 patients.
Koutourousiou M; Gardner PA; Fernandez-Miranda JC; Tyler-Kabara EC; Wang EW; Snyderman CH
J Neurosurg; 2013 Nov; 119(5):1194-207. PubMed ID: 23909243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: a single-institution study.
Jeswani S; Nuño M; Wu A; Bonert V; Carmichael JD; Black KL; Chu R; King W; Mamelak AN
J Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 124(3):627-38. PubMed ID: 26361276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of trauma center volume on major vascular injury: An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).
Taghavi S; Jones G; Duchesne J; McGrew P; Guidry C; Schroll R; Harris C; Nkansah R; Jacome T; Tatum D
Am J Surg; 2020 Sep; 220(3):787-792. PubMed ID: 32061398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas with Intraventricular Extension: Case Series, Long-Term Outcomes, and Review.
Algattas H; Setty P; Goldschmidt E; Wang EW; Tyler-Kabara EC; Snyderman CH; Gardner PA
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e447-e459. PubMed ID: 32890848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term quality of life after endonasal endoscopic resection of adult craniopharyngiomas.
Patel KS; Raza SM; McCoul ED; Patrona A; Greenfield JP; Souweidane MM; Anand VK; Schwartz TH
J Neurosurg; 2015 Sep; 123(3):571-80. PubMed ID: 25884258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas.
Schoenfeld A; Pekmezci M; Barnes MJ; Tihan T; Gupta N; Lamborn KR; Banerjee A; Mueller S; Chang S; Berger MS; Haas-Kogan D
J Neurooncol; 2012 May; 108(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 22350375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Outcome After Extended Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Craniopharyngiomas: Two-Institution Experience.
Park HR; Kshettry VR; Farrell CJ; Lee JM; Kim YH; Won TB; Han DH; Do H; Nyguist G; Rosen M; Kim DG; Evans JJ; Paek SH
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():465-474. PubMed ID: 28433845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
