BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847689)

  • 1. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
    Schneck A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The earth is flat (
    Amrhein V; Korner-Nievergelt F; Roth T
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3544. PubMed ID: 28698825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
    Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are most published research findings false in a continuous universe?
    Neves K; Tan PB; Amaral OB
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277935. PubMed ID: 36538521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining publication bias-a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias.
    Schneck A
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4115. PubMed ID: 29204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; Wicherts JM; van Assen MALM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215052. PubMed ID: 30978228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
    Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting publication selection bias through excess statistical significance.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA; Carter EC
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):776-795. PubMed ID: 34196473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
    Moss J; De Bin R
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating publication bias in meta-analyses of peer-reviewed studies: A meta-meta-analysis across disciplines and journal tiers.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):176-191. PubMed ID: 33108053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
    Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel statistical tools for management of public databases facilitate community-wide replicability and control of false discovery.
    Rosset S; Aharoni E; Neuvirth H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 38(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 24706571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery.
    McElreath R; Smaldino PE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136088. PubMed ID: 26308448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
    Chuard PJC; Vrtílek M; Head ML; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000127. PubMed ID: 30682013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.
    Guan M; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the Evidential Value of Mental Fatigue and Exercise Research.
    Holgado D; Mesquida C; Román-Caballero R
    Sports Med; 2023 Dec; 53(12):2293-2307. PubMed ID: 37682411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.