165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847689)
21. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Publish without bias or perish without replications.
Ventura R
Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2022 Dec; 96():10-17. PubMed ID: 36137303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model.
Fitzpatrick BG; Gorman DM; Trombatore C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303262. PubMed ID: 38753677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.
Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):534-47. PubMed ID: 23855496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Examination of CIs in health and medical journals from 1976 to 2019: an observational study.
Barnett AG; Wren JD
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e032506. PubMed ID: 31753893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Bayesian approach to assessing small-study effects in meta-analysis of a binary outcome with controlled false positive rate.
Shi L; Chu H; Lin L
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):535-552. PubMed ID: 32424987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reproducibility in the absence of selective reporting: An illustration from large-scale brain asymmetry research.
Kong XZ; ; Francks C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jan; 43(1):244-254. PubMed ID: 32841457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimating statistical power, posterior probability and publication bias of psychological research using the observed replication rate.
Ingre M; Nilsonne G
R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Sep; 5(9):181190. PubMed ID: 30839704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study.
Kicinski M
BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e004831. PubMed ID: 25168036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
Du H; Liu F; Wang L
Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.
Szucs D; Ioannidis JP
PLoS Biol; 2017 Mar; 15(3):e2000797. PubMed ID: 28253258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
Rooprai P; Islam N; Salameh JP; Ebrahimzadeh S; Kazi A; Frank R; Ramsay T; Mathur MB; Absi M; Khalil A; Kazi S; Dawit H; Lam E; Fabiano N; McInnes MDF
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2023 Aug; 74(3):497-507. PubMed ID: 36412994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).
Simonsohn U; Simmons JP; Nelson LD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Dec; 144(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 26595842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.
Sutton AJ; Song F; Gilbody SM; Abrams KR
Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):421-45. PubMed ID: 11191259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.
Francis G
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. False discoveries and models for gene discovery.
van den Oord EJ; Sullivan PF
Trends Genet; 2003 Oct; 19(10):537-42. PubMed ID: 14550627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
