These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847689)

  • 41. Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value.
    Bishop DV; Thompson PA
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1715. PubMed ID: 26925335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.
    Johnson VE; Payne RD; Wang T; Asher A; Mandal S
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(517):1-10. PubMed ID: 29861517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reducing the probability of false positive research findings by pre-publication validation - experience with a large multiple sclerosis database.
    Daumer M; Held U; Ickstadt K; Heinz M; Schach S; Ebers G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Apr; 8():18. PubMed ID: 18402689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Power, selection bias and predictive performance of the Population Pharmacokinetic Covariate Model.
    Ribbing J; Jonsson EN
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2004 Apr; 31(2):109-34. PubMed ID: 15379381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Retrospective median power, false positive meta-analysis and large-scale replication.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jan; 13(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 34628722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Publication bias in psychology: a diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size.
    Kühberger A; Fritz A; Scherndl T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e105825. PubMed ID: 25192357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Nonsignificant Findings Are Probably True.
    Lakens D; Etz AJ
    Soc Psychol Personal Sci; 2017 Nov; 8(8):875-881. PubMed ID: 29276574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Estimating the extent of selective reporting: An application to economics.
    Bruns SB; Deressa TK; Stanley TD; Doucouliagos C; Ioannidis JPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):590-602. PubMed ID: 38379427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Tutorial on Hunting Statistical Significance by Chasing
    Szucs D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1444. PubMed ID: 27713723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Bayesian nonparametric test of significance chasing biases.
    Karabatsos G
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 28985020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis.
    Vosgerau J; Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1628-1639. PubMed ID: 31464485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Towards a reduction in publication bias.
    Newcombe RG
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Sep; 295(6599):656-9. PubMed ID: 3117278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.
    Hopewell S; Loudon K; Clarke MJ; Oxman AD; Dickersin K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jan; 2009(1):MR000006. PubMed ID: 19160345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A kinked meta-regression model for publication bias correction.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):497-514. PubMed ID: 31039283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Understanding and Mitigating the Replication Crisis, for Environmental Epidemiologists.
    Bartell SM
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2019 Mar; 6(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 30671781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):546-560. PubMed ID: 28425729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).
    Wicherts JM
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Nov; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29186879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.