These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847689)

  • 41. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.
    Sutton AJ; Song F; Gilbody SM; Abrams KR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):421-45. PubMed ID: 11191259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.
    Hopewell S; Loudon K; Clarke MJ; Oxman AD; Dickersin K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jan; 2009(1):MR000006. PubMed ID: 19160345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Understanding and Mitigating the Replication Crisis, for Environmental Epidemiologists.
    Bartell SM
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2019 Mar; 6(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 30671781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).
    Wicherts JM
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Nov; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29186879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive-a meta-epidemiological study.
    Koster TM; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Jakobsen JC; Kaufmann T; Eck RJ; Koster G; Hiemstra B; van der Horst ICC; Keus E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():1-10. PubMed ID: 31200004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The importance of publication bias in medical-scientific literature].
    de Melker HE; Rosendaal FR; Vandenbroucke JP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Oct; 137(42):2126-30. PubMed ID: 8232658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975-2017).
    Schneck A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292717. PubMed ID: 37847689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 3.