167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847775)
41. End-to-end learning of multiple sequence alignments with differentiable Smith-Waterman.
Petti S; Bhattacharya N; Rao R; Dauparas J; Thomas N; Zhou J; Rush AM; Koo P; Ovchinnikov S
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36355460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evolutionary rates at codon sites may be used to align sequences and infer protein domain function.
Durand PM; Hazelhurst S; Coetzer TL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 11():151. PubMed ID: 20334658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. DeepECA: an end-to-end learning framework for protein contact prediction from a multiple sequence alignment.
Fukuda H; Tomii K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):10. PubMed ID: 31918654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. PROMALS: towards accurate multiple sequence alignments of distantly related proteins.
Pei J; Grishin NV
Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 17267437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. TPMA: A two pointers meta-alignment tool to ensemble different multiple nucleic acid sequence alignments.
Zhai Y; Chao J; Wang Y; Zhang P; Tang F; Zou Q
PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Apr; 20(4):e1011988. PubMed ID: 38557416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. DAMA: a method for computing multiple alignments of protein structures using local structure descriptors.
Daniluk P; Oleniecki T; Lesyng B
Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 38(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 34396393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Model-based prediction of sequence alignment quality.
Ahola V; Aittokallio T; Vihinen M; Uusipaikka E
Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(19):2165-71. PubMed ID: 18678587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. OXBench: a benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy.
Raghava GP; Searle SM; Audley PC; Barber JD; Barton GJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 4():47. PubMed ID: 14552658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. COFFEE: an objective function for multiple sequence alignments.
Notredame C; Holm L; Higgins DG
Bioinformatics; 1998 Jun; 14(5):407-22. PubMed ID: 9682054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Using de novo protein structure predictions to measure the quality of very large multiple sequence alignments.
Fox G; Sievers F; Higgins DG
Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(6):814-20. PubMed ID: 26568625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. SAlign-a structure aware method for global PPI network alignment.
Ayub U; Haider I; Naveed H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):500. PubMed ID: 33148180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. INTREPID--INformation-theoretic TREe traversal for Protein functional site IDentification.
Sankararaman S; Sjölander K
Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 24(21):2445-52. PubMed ID: 18776193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Estimates of statistical significance for comparison of individual positions in multiple sequence alignments.
Sadreyev RI; Grishin NV
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 5():106. PubMed ID: 15296518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Obtaining extremely large and accurate protein multiple sequence alignments from curated hierarchical alignments.
Neuwald AF; Lanczycki CJ; Hodges TK; Marchler-Bauer A
Database (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 2020():. PubMed ID: 32500917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. M2Align: parallel multiple sequence alignment with a multi-objective metaheuristic.
Zambrano-Vega C; Nebro AJ; García-Nieto J; Aldana-Montes JF
Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 33(19):3011-3017. PubMed ID: 28541404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Improving protein-protein interaction prediction using evolutionary information from low-quality MSAs.
Várnai C; Burkoff NS; Wild DL
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0169356. PubMed ID: 28166227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Use of a database of structural alignments and phylogenetic trees in investigating the relationship between sequence and structural variability among homologous proteins.
Balaji S; Srinivasan N
Protein Eng; 2001 Apr; 14(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 11391013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. ICARUS: flexible protein structural alignment based on Protein Units.
Cretin G; Périn C; Zimmermann N; Galochkina T; Gelly JC
Bioinformatics; 2023 Aug; 39(8):. PubMed ID: 37498544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Context similarity scoring improves protein sequence alignments in the midnight zone.
Meier A; Söding J
Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(5):674-81. PubMed ID: 25338715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
