These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847829)
1. 3D-Printed Implant Sliding Guide: A New Dental Implant Surgical Guide. Al Kabany MH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Oct; 38(5):874-884. PubMed ID: 37847829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of implant placement using CAD-CAM tooth-supported surgical guides for an auricular prosthesis in vitro. Fan Y; Wei H; Zhao R; Lin X; Bai S J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 36710294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting. Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods. Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed. Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deviation of dental implants placed using a novel 3D-printed surgical guide: An in vitro study. Etajuri EA; Suliman E; Mahmood WAA; Ibrahim N; Buzayan M; Mohd NR Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):359-362. PubMed ID: 33448161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of a partially guided system using an in-office 3D-printed surgical guide for implant placement. Cho JY; Kim SB; Ryu J Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 34006060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a 3D printed sleeveless guide system used for fiber post removal: An in vitro study. Mo S; Xu Y; Zhang L; Cao Y; Zhou Y; Xu X J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104367. PubMed ID: 36402258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a custom two-piece surgical guide for all-on-four dental implant placement: An in vitro study. Elnashoukaty HM; ElDakkak S; Abdelhakim A J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):101.e1-101.e9. PubMed ID: 37230911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retentive design of a small surgical guide for implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Kobe T; Fidler A; Kuralt M; Gašpirc B; Gašperšič R J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104384. PubMed ID: 36470471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Intraoperative Measuring Guide and Conventional Surgical Guide in Anterior Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. Wang Y; Xie C; Fang T; Chen Z; Yu H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):277-286. PubMed ID: 36525249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides. D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy Evaluation of the Computer-Designed Selective Laser Sintering Surgical Guide for Flapless Immediate Loading Dental Implants Surgery in Edentulous Jaws. de Almeida Prado Di Giacomo G; Cury P; da Silva AM; da Silva JVL; Pompeo Souto CE; Martines RT; Ajzen S J Oral Implantol; 2022 Aug; 48(4):263-268. PubMed ID: 34091668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy assessment of implant placement with versus without a CAD/CAM surgical guide by novices versus specialists via the digital registration method: an in vitro randomized crossover study. Li S; Yi C; Yu Z; Wu A; Zhang Y; Lin Y BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):426. PubMed ID: 37370027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation. Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of template-based guided dental implant placement-An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods. Sium-Abel A; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Bourauel C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):864-875. PubMed ID: 38629760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]