These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37847850)

  • 1. Previous Mental Load and Incentives Influence Anticipatory Arousal as Indexed by the Baseline Pupil Diameter in a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Alfandari D; Richter M; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Naylor G
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231196520. PubMed ID: 37847850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensions of self-reported listening effort and fatigue on a digits-in-noise task, and association with baseline pupil size and performance accuracy.
    Alhanbali S; Munro KJ; Dawes P; Carolan PJ; Millman RE
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Oct; 60(10):762-772. PubMed ID: 33320028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
    Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupil Dilation and Microsaccades Provide Complementary Insights into the Dynamics of Arousal and Instantaneous Attention during Effortful Listening.
    Contadini-Wright C; Magami K; Mehta N; Chait M
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(26):4856-4866. PubMed ID: 37127361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention Mobilization as a Modulator of Listening Effort: Evidence From Pupillometry.
    Johns MA; Calloway RC; Karunathilake IMD; Decruy LP; Anderson S; Simon JZ; Kuchinsky SE
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241245240. PubMed ID: 38613337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
    Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring listening-related effort and fatigue in school-aged children using pupillometry.
    McGarrigle R; Dawes P; Stewart AJ; Kuchinsky SE; Munro KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Sep; 161():95-112. PubMed ID: 28505505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.
    Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.
    Książek P; Zekveld AA; Fiedler L; Kramer SE; Wendt D
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study.
    Fiedler L; Seifi Ala T; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pupillometry reveals changes in physiological arousal during a sustained listening task.
    McGarrigle R; Dawes P; Stewart AJ; Kuchinsky SE; Munro KJ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Feb; 54(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 27731503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of monetary reward on listening effort and sentence recognition.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108255. PubMed ID: 33964552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.