BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37848692)

  • 1. Quantitative [
    Kendrick J; Francis RJ; Hassan GM; Rowshanfarzad P; Ong JSL; Barry N; Rusanov B; Ebert MA
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17673. PubMed ID: 37848692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fully automatic prognostic biomarker extraction from metastatic prostate lesion segmentations in whole-body [
    Kendrick J; Francis RJ; Hassan GM; Rowshanfarzad P; Ong JSL; Ebert MA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Dec; 50(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 35976392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective comparison of simultaneous [
    Jentjens S; Mai C; Ahmadi Bidakhvidi N; De Coster L; Mertens N; Koole M; Everaerts W; Joniau S; Oyen R; Van Laere K; Goffin K
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):901-911. PubMed ID: 34374802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic utility of RECIP 1.0 with manual and AI-based segmentations in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer from [
    Kendrick J; Francis RJ; Hassan GM; Rowshanfarzad P; Ong JS; McCarthy M; Alexander S; Ebert MA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Nov; 50(13):4077-4086. PubMed ID: 37550494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined Early and Late [
    Hohberg M; Kobe C; Täger P; Hammes J; Schmidt M; Dietlein F; Wild M; Heidenreich A; Drzezga A; Dietlein M
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):558-566. PubMed ID: 30105521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid imaging with [
    Glemser PA; Rotkopf LT; Ziener CH; Beuthien-Baumann B; Weru V; Kopp-Schneider A; Schlemmer HP; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Sachpekidis C
    Cancer Imaging; 2022 Sep; 22(1):53. PubMed ID: 36138437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.
    Schmidkonz C; Cordes M; Goetz TI; Prante O; Kuwert T; Ritt P; Uder M; Wullich B; Goebell P; Bäuerle T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):766-775. PubMed ID: 31338731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective head-to-head comparison of [
    Wang G; Li L; Zhu M; Zang J; Wang J; Wang R; Yan W; Zhu L; Kung HF; Zhu Z
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Aug; 50(10):3126-3136. PubMed ID: 37233785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of
    Seifert R; Sandach P; Kersting D; Fendler WP; Hadaschik B; Herrmann K; Sunderland JJ; Pollard JH
    J Nucl Med; 2022 May; 63(5):746-753. PubMed ID: 34446454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biodistribution of [(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Characterization of Uptake in Normal Organs and Tumour Lesions.
    Prasad V; Steffen IG; Diederichs G; Makowski MR; Wust P; Brenner W
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Jun; 18(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 27038316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Caroli P; Sandler I; Matteucci F; De Giorgi U; Uccelli L; Celli M; Foca F; Barone D; Romeo A; Sarnelli A; Paganelli G
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2035-2044. PubMed ID: 29922948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head-to-head comparisons of [
    Ke ZB; Chen SM; Chen JY; Chen SH; You Q; Sun JB; Xue YT; Sun XL; Wu XH; Zheng QS; Wei Y; Xue XY; Xu N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1240-1251. PubMed ID: 36416906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Ceci F; Castellucci P; Graziani T; Farolfi A; Fonti C; Lodi F; Fanti S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 30350010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of optimal
    Wen J; Zhu Y; Li L; Liu J; Chen Y; Chen R
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 May; 49(6):2086-2095. PubMed ID: 34962583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Head-to-head comparison of [
    Wang G; Hong H; Zang J; Liu Q; Jiang Y; Fan X; Zhu Z; Zhu L; Kung HF
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Feb; 49(3):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 34557930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incremental Impact of [
    Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Perera M; Papa N; Roberts M; Williams M; Udovicich C; Vela I; Christidis D; Bolton D; Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG
    Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.