These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37848793)
21. The impact of a gain-sharing cost-reflective tariff on waste management cost under incentive regulation: The Italian case. Di Foggia G; Beccarello M J Environ Manage; 2020 Jul; 265():110526. PubMed ID: 32275246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exploring the restrictive factors for the development of the construction waste recycling industry in a second-tier Chinese city: a case study from Jinan. Wei Y; Zhang L; Sang P Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46394-46413. PubMed ID: 36719585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. From intention to behavior: Comprehending residents' waste sorting intention and behavior formation process. Wang S; Wang J; Yang S; Li J; Zhou K Waste Manag; 2020 Jul; 113():41-50. PubMed ID: 32505110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China. Lu W; Yuan H; Li J; Hao JJ; Mi X; Ding Z Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 21208794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Towards Sustainable Cities: The Spillover Effects of Waste-Sorting Policies on Sustainable Consumption. Yang S; Cheng P; Wang S; Li J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Domestic waste recycling, collective action and economic incentive: the case in Hong Kong. Yau Y Waste Manag; 2010 Dec; 30(12):2440-7. PubMed ID: 20619628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Enhancing municipal solid waste recycling through reorganizing waste pickers: A case study in Nanjing, China. Chen F; Luo Z; Yang Y; Liu GJ; Ma J Waste Manag Res; 2018 Sep; 36(9):767-778. PubMed ID: 29607776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Economic benefits of construction waste recycling enterprises under tax incentive policies. Liu J; Gong E; Wang X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(9):12574-12588. PubMed ID: 33856632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Drift in policy implementation: Incentives thwarted in a recycling programme. Bian S; Nduneseokwu CK; Li C; Harder MK Waste Manag Res; 2022 Jun; 40(6):836-845. PubMed ID: 34286637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Source separation of household waste: a case study in China. Zhuang Y; Wu SW; Wang YL; Wu WX; Chen YX Waste Manag; 2008; 28(10):2022-30. PubMed ID: 17920856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Individual Preference Framework or Group Preference Framework? Which Will Regulate the Impact Path of Product Facilities on Residents' Waste-Sorting Behavior Better. Chen F; Wang F; Hou J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32235579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. New multi-source waste co-incineration and clustering park operating model for small- and medium-sized city: A case study in China. Fei F; Wen Z; Zhang J; Xing Y; Zhang H; Li Y J Environ Manage; 2024 Mar; 355():120514. PubMed ID: 38460330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. What shapes food waste behaviors? New insights from a comprehensive action determination model. Cheng X; Zhang J; Li W Waste Manag; 2024 May; 181():188-198. PubMed ID: 38615501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Incentivizing household recycling crowds out public support for other waste management policies: A long-term quasi-experimental study. Ling M; Xu L J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 299():113675. PubMed ID: 34526278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Food waste tectonics: Points of friction between policy push and practice pull in council-led household-food-waste interventions in Australia. Landells E; Naweed A; Karunasena GG; Pearson DH; Oakden S J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 357():120717. PubMed ID: 38579466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Redesign of urban biowaste sustainable management system based on industrial ecology concept: A case study in China. Fei F; Shen N; De Clercq D; Luo J Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 793():148425. PubMed ID: 34182457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention study. Xu L; Ling M; Wu Y Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():522-531. PubMed ID: 29735360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influencing Factors on the Household-Waste-Classification Behavior of Urban Residents: A Case Study in Shanghai. Tang D; Shi L; Huang X; Zhao Z; Zhou B; Bethel BJ Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Generation, collection and transportation, disposal and recycling of kitchen waste: a case study in Shanghai. An Y; Li G; Wu W; Huang J; He W; Zhu H Waste Manag Res; 2014 Mar; 32(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 24522775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a financial incentive intervention on malaria prevalence among the residents in Lake Victoria basin, Kenya: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Matsumoto T; Nagashima M; Kagaya W; Kongere J; Gitaka J; Kaneko A Trials; 2024 Mar; 25(1):165. PubMed ID: 38438925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]