32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37849356)
1. Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines.
Malley JD; Kruppa J; Dasgupta A; Malley KG; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21915433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Don't dismiss logistic regression: the case for sensible extraction of interactions in the era of machine learning.
Levy JJ; O'Malley AJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):171. PubMed ID: 32600277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Inverse Probability Weighting by Post-calibrating Its Propensity Scores.
Gutman R; Karavani E; Shimoni Y
Epidemiology; 2024 Jul; 35(4):473-480. PubMed ID: 38619218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration plots for multistate risk predictions models.
Pate A; Sperrin M; Riley RD; Peek N; Van Staa T; Sergeant JC; Mamas MA; Lip GYH; O'Flaherty M; Barrowman M; Buchan I; Martin GP
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(14):2830-2852. PubMed ID: 38720592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of clinical prediction models developed using statistical or machine learning methods.
Riley RD; Collins GS
Biom J; 2023 Dec; 65(8):e2200302. PubMed ID: 37466257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the use of cross-validation for the calibration of the adaptive lasso.
Ballout N; Etievant L; Viallon V
Biom J; 2023 Jun; 65(5):e2200047. PubMed ID: 36960476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of calibration drift in clinical prediction models to inform model updating.
Davis SE; Greevy RA; Lasko TA; Walsh CG; Matheny ME
J Biomed Inform; 2020 Dec; 112():103611. PubMed ID: 33157313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An overview of machine learning methods for monotherapy drug response prediction.
Firoozbakht F; Yousefi B; Schwikowski B
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 34619752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk Projection for Time-to-event Outcome Leveraging Summary Statistics With Source Individual-level Data.
Zheng J; Zheng Y; Hsu L
J Am Stat Assoc; 2022; 117(540):2043-2055. PubMed ID: 36687294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case-Control Studies.
Wu Y; Gail M; Smith-Warner S; Ziegler R; Wang M
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A constrained maximum likelihood approach to developing well-calibrated models for predicting binary outcomes.
Cao Y; Ma W; Zhao G; McCarthy AM; Chen J
Lifetime Data Anal; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38717617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-parametric inference on calibration of predicted risks.
Sadatsafavi M; Petkau J
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38863133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calibrating random forests for probability estimation.
Dankowski T; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(22):3949-60. PubMed ID: 27074747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Algorithm's Prediction of 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma Perform on International Validation?
Bongers MER; Karhade AV; Setola E; Gambarotti M; Groot OQ; Erdoğan KE; Picci P; Donati DM; Schwab JH; Palmerini E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2300-2308. PubMed ID: 32433107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Web-Based Calculator to Predict Early Death Among Patients With Bone Metastasis Using Machine Learning Techniques: Development and Validation Study.
Lei M; Wu B; Zhang Z; Qin Y; Cao X; Cao Y; Liu B; Su X; Liu Y
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e47590. PubMed ID: 37870889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory.
Kruppa J; Liu Y; Biau G; Kohler M; König IR; Malley JD; Ziegler A
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):534-63. PubMed ID: 24478134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibrating spatiotemporal models of microbial communities to microscopy data: A review.
Yip A; Smith-Roberge J; Khorasani SH; Aucoin MG; Ingalls BP
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Oct; 18(10):e1010533. PubMed ID: 36227846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calibrating machine learning approaches for probability estimation: A comprehensive comparison.
Ojeda FM; Jansen ML; Thiéry A; Blankenberg S; Weimar C; Schmid M; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(29):5451-5478. PubMed ID: 37849356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
