138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37849573)
21. A Comparative Study of Fine-Needle Aspiration and Nonaspiration Cytology Diagnosis in Thyroid Lesions.
Archana E; Vijayakumar C; Raj Kumar N; Balasubramanian G; Srinivasan K; Sreenath GS; Siddaraju N
Niger J Surg; 2020; 26(2):147-152. PubMed ID: 33223814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kang YJ; Lee HW; Stybayeva G; Hwang SH
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38398142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cytopathology and AgNOR counts in fine-needle aspiration cytology smears of thyroid lesions.
Mehrotra A; Agarwal PK; Chandra T
Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Oct; 19(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 9784984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative study of manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC) technique and direct smear technique (conventional) on fine-needle cytology/fine-needle aspiration cytology samples.
Pawar PS; Gadkari RU; Swami SY; Joshi AR
J Cytol; 2014 Apr; 31(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 25210235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of conventional cytology and SurePath in split thyroid fine needle aspiration materials.
Sahin D; Yilmazbayhan D; Firat P; Hacisalihoglu UP; Kirimlioglu SH; Celenk E; Arslan R
Cytopathology; 2017 Aug; 28(4):291-298. PubMed ID: 28696007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A pilot study evaluating liquid-based fine needle aspiration cytology of breast lesions: a cytomorphological comparison of SurePath® liquid-based preparations and conventional smears.
Ryu HS; Park IA; Park SY; Jung YY; Park SH; Shin HC
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 23860283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Performance Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparation Methods in Thyroid FNAs.
Erdoğan B; Karabağ A; Kasap HA; Çivi Çetin K; Bal C; Şimşek G
J Cytol; 2023; 40(4):184-191. PubMed ID: 38058674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bethesda classification is a valuable guide for fine needle aspiration reports and highly predictive especially for diagnosing aggressive variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Evranos B; Polat SB; Baser H; Ozdemir D; Kilicarslan A; Yalcin A; Ersoy R; Cakir B
Cytopathology; 2017 Aug; 28(4):259-267. PubMed ID: 27666595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration combined with Surepath liquid-based cytology test for lung lesions and mediastinal lymphadenopathy].
Xiong S; Liu N; Han Q; Jiang Y; Su X
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 44(9):633-8. PubMed ID: 26705278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Liquid-based cytology in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the thyroid gland.
Fadda G; Rossi ED
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(5):389-400. PubMed ID: 21986164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting.
Sykes PH; Harker DY; Miller A; Whitehead M; Neal H; Wells JE; Peddie D
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 18823488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Utility of microdissected cytology smears for molecular analysis of thyroid malignancy.
Kumar G; Timmaraju VA; Song-Yang JW; Repko B; Narick C; Mireskandari A; Finkelstein S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 47(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 30548138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative Analysis of Liquid based and Conventional Cytology Smears in Fine Needle Aspirates from Breast Lesions.
Sharma V; Gupta V; Parmar P; Jain P; Thakran D; Sen R
J Cytol; 2019; 36(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 30992643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ThinPrep vs. conventional smear cytologic preparations in analyzing fine-needle aspiration specimens from palpable breast masses.
Biscotti CV; Shorie JH; Gramlich TL; Easley KA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Aug; 21(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10425053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Diagnostic Rates and Concordance with Subsequent Surgical Resections between Conventional Smear and ThinPrep Preparations versus ThinPrep Only in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration (T-FNA) Specimens.
Rufail M; Jing X; Smola B; Heider A; Cantley R; Pang JC; Lew M
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 34753139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preoperative detection of malignancy in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smears with indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III, IV) by a combined molecular classifier.
Titov S; Demenkov PS; Lukyanov SA; Sergiyko SV; Katanyan GA; Veryaskina YA; Ivanov MK
J Clin Pathol; 2020 Nov; 73(11):722-727. PubMed ID: 32213552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Liquid-based versus conventional cytology in solid pediatric neoplasm: Comparison of their diagnostic and morphological spectra.
Agarwal P; Yadav S; Kumar A; Goel MM
J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 28028334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Application of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology for classification of thyroid nodules: A clinical and cytopathological characteristics in Bhutanese population.
Choden S; Wangmo C; Maharjan S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Nov; 49(11):1179-1187. PubMed ID: 34320270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy and Pitfalls of FNAC of Thyroid Lesions in Children and Adolescents.
Vasudev V; A L H; B R; S G
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Jan; 8(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 24596718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
