These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3784992)

  • 1. Reduction of aliasing in modulation transfer function measurements.
    Ehrhardt JC
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):658-62. PubMed ID: 3784992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cosine modulation artifact in modulation transfer function computations caused by the misregistration of line spread profiles.
    Steckner MC; Drost DJ; Prato FS
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):469-73. PubMed ID: 8497239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterisation of the signal and noise transfer of CCD cameras for electron detection.
    Meyer RR; Kirkland AI
    Microsc Res Tech; 2000 May; 49(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 10816267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Texture analysis in radiographs: the influence of modulation transfer function and noise on the discriminative ability of texture features.
    Veenland JF; Grashuis JL; Gelsema ES
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):922-36. PubMed ID: 9650183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements.
    Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1955-63. PubMed ID: 8994160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Giger ML; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 6738452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The need for investigating the optical transfer functions in several field orientations for nonisotropic radiographic systems.
    Schiabel H; Frére AF; Marques PM
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):999-1005. PubMed ID: 8413044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) used for clinical radiotherapy: a phantom study.
    McGee KP; Das IJ; Sims C
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1815-27. PubMed ID: 8587536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter?
    Moy JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 10659741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ; Schueler BA; Ritenour ER
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):913-21. PubMed ID: 12033588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method.
    Greer PB; van Doorn T
    Med Phys; 2000 Sep; 27(9):2048-59. PubMed ID: 11011732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal pitch in spiral computed tomography.
    Wang G; Vannier MW
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1635-9. PubMed ID: 9350718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal sampling and aliasing in spiral CT.
    Yen SY; Yan CH; Rubin GD; Napel S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jan; 18(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 10193696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of noise in phase contrast MR imaging.
    Andersen AH; Kirsch JE
    Med Phys; 1996 Jun; 23(6):857-69. PubMed ID: 8798171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional reconstruction of curves from pairs of projection views in the presence of error. II. Analysis of error.
    Bullitt E; Liu A; Pizer SM
    Med Phys; 1997 Nov; 24(11):1679-87. PubMed ID: 9394274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques.
    Cunningham IA; Reid BK
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of a fluoroscopic imaging system for kV and MV radiography.
    Drake DG; Jaffray DA; Wong JW
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 10841392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phase effects in diagnostic radiological images.
    Gray JE; Trefler M
    Med Phys; 1976; 3(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 958165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography.
    Hejazi S; Trauernicht DP
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 9048370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallel cascades: new ways to describe noise transfer in medical imaging systems.
    Yao J; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2020-38. PubMed ID: 11695765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.