123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3784994)
1. Dose comparisons for mammographic systems.
Speiser RC; Zanrosso EM; Jeromin LS; Carlson RA
Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 3784994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient exposures from film and xeroradiographic mammographic techniques.
Rothenberg LN; Kirch RL; Snyder RE
Radiology; 1975 Dec; 117(3 Pt 1):701-3. PubMed ID: 1188121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA
Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)].
Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications.
Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Nov; 139(5):913-8. PubMed ID: 6981974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Film and xeroradiographic images in mammography. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum anode materials.
Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M
Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):968-72. PubMed ID: 1218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of mammography screen-film combinations.
Schueler BA; Gray JE; Gisvold JJ
Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 1509043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets.
Blough MM; Waggener RG; Payne WH; Terry JA
Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1605-12. PubMed ID: 9775364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Thermoluminescent dosimetry for radiation exposure of the breast during film and xeromammography (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Ruff A; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1978 May; 128(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 149076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice.
Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):830-4. PubMed ID: 12033579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose reduction in mammography.
Mintzer RA; Matthies HJ; Lin PP; Neiman HL; Rogers LF
Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(5):465-6. PubMed ID: 914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Processing of mammographic films: technical and clinical considerations.
Tabar L; Haus AG
Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 2781032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic practice and dosimetry in Britain.
Fitzgerald M; White DR; White E; Young J
Br J Radiol; 1981 Mar; 54(639):212-20. PubMed ID: 7470783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Chow S
Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 1987598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
Waegner U; Geissler S; Rosenkranz G
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
