These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37851849)

  • 1. An Eye-Fixation Related Electroencephalography Technique for Predicting Situation Awareness: Implications for Driver State Monitoring Systems.
    Yang J; Liang N; Pitts BJ; Prakah-Asante K; Curry R; Yu D
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2138-2153. PubMed ID: 37851849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving.
    Liang N; Yang J; Yu D; Prakah-Asante KO; Curry R; Blommer M; Swaminathan R; Pitts BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106143. PubMed ID: 34010743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of conversation on situation awareness and working memory in simulated driving.
    Heenan A; Herdman CM; Brown MS; Robert N
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1077-92. PubMed ID: 25277018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive States Matter: Design Guidelines for Driving Situation Awareness in Smart Vehicles.
    Park D; Yoon WC; Lee U
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 32456354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supervising the self-driving car: Situation awareness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    McKerral A; Pammer K; Gauld C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jul; 187():107068. PubMed ID: 37075544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of working memory in supporting drivers' situation awareness for surrounding traffic.
    Johannsdottir KR; Herdman CM
    Hum Factors; 2010 Dec; 52(6):663-73. PubMed ID: 21284368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Task-Induced Fatigue in Prolonged Conditional Automated Driving.
    Jarosch O; Bellem H; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1186-1199. PubMed ID: 30657711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting driver's takeover time based on individual characteristics, external environment, and situation awareness.
    Chen H; Zhao X; Li H; Gong J; Fu Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107601. PubMed ID: 38718664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.
    Ma S; Zhang W; Yang Z; Kang C; Wu C; Chai C; Shi J; Li H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(7):482-487. PubMed ID: 32822218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Low-Event Task Subjective Situation Awareness (LETSSA) technique: Development and evaluation of a new subjective measure of situation awareness.
    Rose J; Bearman C; Dorrian J
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():273-282. PubMed ID: 29409644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Situation awareness measures for simulated submarine track management.
    Loft S; Bowden V; Braithwaite J; Morrell DB; Huf S; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 25850159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Zhou F; Pulver EM; Tilbury DM; Robert LP; Pradhan AK; Yang XJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105748. PubMed ID: 33099127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Yang XJ; Zhou F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105804. PubMed ID: 33128991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1583-1599. PubMed ID: 36473708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
    Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of non-driving related tasks on the development of driver sleepiness and takeover performances in prolonged automated driving.
    Pan H; He H; Wang Y; Cheng Y; Dai Z
    J Safety Res; 2023 Sep; 86():148-163. PubMed ID: 37718042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.
    Roche F; Somieski A; Brandenburg S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 30517032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.