These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37851849)

  • 21. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
    Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up.
    Wörle J; Metz B; Othersen I; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105617. PubMed ID: 32540623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring situation awareness and team effectiveness in pediatric acute care by using the situation global assessment technique.
    Coolen E; Draaisma J; Loeffen J
    Eur J Pediatr; 2019 Jun; 178(6):837-850. PubMed ID: 30900075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An analysis of physiological responses as indicators of driver takeover readiness in conditionally automated driving.
    Deng M; Gluck A; Zhao Y; Li D; Menassa CC; Kamat VR; Brinkley J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107372. PubMed ID: 37979464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Driver Situation Awareness for Regaining Control from Conditionally Automated Vehicles: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; ():187208241272071. PubMed ID: 39191668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Driver distraction and its effects on partially automated driving performance: A driving simulator study among young-experienced drivers.
    Zangi N; Srour-Zreik R; Ridel D; Chasidim H; Borowsky A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106565. PubMed ID: 35032704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effects of Auditory Working Memory Task on Situation Awareness in Complex Dynamic Environments: An Eye-movement Study.
    Xie X; Li T; Xu S; Yu Y; Ma Y; Liu Z; Ji M
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1844-1859. PubMed ID: 37529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Where drivers are looking at during takeover: Implications for safe takeovers during conditionally automated driving.
    Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):599-608. PubMed ID: 37347169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring Driver Perception: Combining Eye-Tracking and Automated Road Scene Perception.
    Stapel J; El Hassnaoui M; Happee R
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):714-731. PubMed ID: 32993382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness.
    Rose J; Bearman C; Naweed A; Dorrian J
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jan; 62(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 30265217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Once a driver, always a driver - Manual driving style persists in automated driving takeover.
    de Winter JCF; Verschoor K; Doubek F; Happee R
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Nov; 121():104366. PubMed ID: 39178553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driver behavior and mental workload for takeover safety in automated driving: ACT-R prediction modeling approach.
    Oh H; Yun Y; Myung R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 38252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style.
    Lee Y; Dong M; Krishnamoorthy V; Akash K; Misu T; Zheng Z; Huang G
    Hum Factors; 2024 Sep; 66(9):2166-2178. PubMed ID: 37295016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of duration of monitoring before takeover request on takeover time with insights into eye tracking data.
    Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107018. PubMed ID: 36924623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential.
    Louw T; Madigan R; Carsten O; Merat N
    Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 23(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 27655754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Location on Driver Task Performance, Eye Gaze Behavior, and Workload During Conditionally Automated Driving: Nondriving-Related Task and Take-Over.
    Ban G; Park W
    Hum Factors; 2024 Dec; 66(12):2651-2668. PubMed ID: 38240077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of a secondary task on drivers' gap acceptance and situational awareness at junctions.
    Robbins CJ; Rogers J; Walton S; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Ergonomics; 2021 Feb; 64(2):184-198. PubMed ID: 33016818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Towards unpacking older drivers' visual-motor coordination: A gaze-based integrated driving assessment.
    Sun QC; Xia JC; He J; Foster J; Falkmer T; Lee H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():85-96. PubMed ID: 29407672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.