214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37852760)
1. Evaluation of the quality and reliability of anal cancer and its precancerous lesions-related content on YouTube: a cross-sectional study.
Chen Z; Pan S; Zhou M; Wang X
BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e074787. PubMed ID: 37852760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TikTok and YouTube as sources of information on anal fissure: A comparative analysis.
Chen Z; Pan S; Zuo S
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1000338. PubMed ID: 36407987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
Zhang X; Yang Y; Shen YW; Zhang KR; Ma LT; Ding C; Wang BY; Meng Y; Liu H
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():972348. PubMed ID: 36211682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.
Toksoz A; Duran MB
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Dec; 17(6):858.e1-858.e6. PubMed ID: 34756784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.
Bai G; Pan X; Zhao T; Chen X; Liu G; Fu W
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():905609. PubMed ID: 35664123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.
Ozsoy-Unubol T; Alanbay-Yagci E
Int J Rheum Dis; 2021 Feb; 24(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 33355406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.
Toprak T; Tokat E
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):449.e1-449.e6. PubMed ID: 33824069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.
Kunze KN; Krivicich LM; Verma NN; Chahla J
Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):233-238. PubMed ID: 31864582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.
Seyyar SA; Mete A; Tıskaoğlu NS
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Sep; 45(7):748-755. PubMed ID: 35701305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Education Videos for Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Cross-sectional Study.
Yildiz S; Toros SZ
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Sep; 42(8):e1077-e1083. PubMed ID: 34028400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.
Garip R; Sakallioğlu AK
Orbit; 2022 Oct; 41(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 34713759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.
Duran MB; Kizilkan Y
Andrologia; 2021 Sep; 53(8):e14118. PubMed ID: 34009641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.
Karataş ME; Karataş G
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(2):754-759. PubMed ID: 34331096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.
Sun F; Zheng S; Wu J
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e39162. PubMed ID: 36753307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.
Liu Z; Chen Y; Lin Y; Ai M; Lian D; Zhang Y; Shen Y; Yu F
BMC Public Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):1594. PubMed ID: 38877432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain.
Kara M; Ozduran E; Mercan Kara M; Hanci V; Erkin Y
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17215. PubMed ID: 38618560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. YouTube videos in Japanese as a source of information on nocturnal enuresis: A content-quality and reliability analysis.
Nishizaki N; Hirano D; Oishi K; Shimizu T
Pediatr Int; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e15049. PubMed ID: 34747553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are YouTube videos about skull bone anatomy useful for students?
Cuglan S; Gas S
Clin Anat; 2024 Apr; 37(3):344-352. PubMed ID: 38308488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the quality of information on treatment of keratoconus on YouTube.
Çetinkaya Yaprak A; Erkan Pota Ç
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 42(5):1499-1505. PubMed ID: 34845598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the quality and reliability of trifocal intraocular lens videos on YouTube.
Berhuni M
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Jan; 46(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 36462944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
