220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37852913)
1. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Sepsis-Associated Cardiogenic Shock With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Sato R; Hasegawa D; Guo SC; Nishida K; Dugar S
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 Jan; 38(1):207-213. PubMed ID: 37852913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Escalation strategies, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock patients receiving percutaneous left ventricular support.
Patlolla SH; Gilbert ON; Belford PM; Morris BN; Jentzer JC; Pisani BA; Applegate RJ; Zhao DX; Vallabhajosyula S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 37473420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten-year trends, predictors and outcomes of mechanical circulatory support in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.
Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Sandhu GS; Bell MR; Gulati R; Eleid MF; Best PJM; Gersh BJ; Singh M; Lerman A; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW;
EuroIntervention; 2021 Feb; 16(15):e1254-e1261. PubMed ID: 31746759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Plus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Nishi T; Ishii M; Tsujita K; Okamoto H; Koto S; Nakai M; Sumita Y; Iwanaga Y; Matoba S; Kobayashi Y; Hirata KI; Hikichi Y; Yokoi H; Ikari Y; Uemura S
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Apr; 11(7):e023713. PubMed ID: 35377180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
Vallabhajosyula S; O'Horo JC; Antharam P; Ananthaneni S; Vallabhajosyula S; Stulak JM; Eleid MF; Dunlay SM; Gersh BJ; Rihal CS; Barsness GW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006930. PubMed ID: 30354593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications from percutaneous-left ventricular assist devices versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock.
Vallabhajosyula S; Subramaniam AV; Murphree DH; Patlolla SH; Ya'Qoub L; Kumar V; Verghese D; Cheungpasitporn W; Jentzer JC; Sandhu GS; Gulati R; Shah ND; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bell MR; Barsness GW
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238046. PubMed ID: 32833995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sociodemographic differences in utilization and outcomes for temporary cardiovascular mechanical support in the setting of cardiogenic shock.
Thangam M; Luke AA; Johnson DY; Amin AP; Lasala J; Huang K; Joynt Maddox KE
Am Heart J; 2021 Jun; 236():87-96. PubMed ID: 33359779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device as mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary academic medical center.
Nouri SN; Malick W; Masoumi A; Fried JA; Topkara VK; Brener MI; Ahmad Y; Prasad M; Rabbani LE; Takeda K; Karmpaliotis D; Moses JW; Leon MB; Kirtane AJ; Garan AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33325612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Sjauw KD; van Dongen IM; Hirsch A; Packer EJ; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 27810347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Nonacute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.
Watanabe A; Miyamoto Y; Ueyama H; Gotanda H; Tsugawa Y; Kuno T
J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Jun; 13(11):e034645. PubMed ID: 38804220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential Prognostic Implications of Vasoactive Inotropic Score for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock According to Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Choi KH; Yang JH; Park TK; Lee JM; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Ko YG; Yu CW; Chun WJ; Jang WJ; Kim HJ; Bae JW; Kwon SU; Lee HJ; Lee WS; Jeong JO; Park SD; Cho S; Gwon HC
Crit Care Med; 2021 May; 49(5):770-780. PubMed ID: 33590998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
Buda KG; Hryniewicz K; Eckman PM; Basir MB; Cowger JA; Alaswad K; Mukundan S; Sandoval Y; Elliott A; Brilakis ES; Megaly MS
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2024 May; 13(5):390-397. PubMed ID: 38502888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
