144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37853530)
1. Patient-Directed Vasectomy Information: How Readable Is It?
Kianian R; Hu MY; Lavold AJ; Andino JJ; Morrison JC; Eleswarapu SV; Mills JN
World J Mens Health; 2024 Apr; 42(2):408-414. PubMed ID: 37853530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should I freeze my sperm?-readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking.
Kianian R; Belarmino A; Finkelshtein I; Mills JN; Eleswarapu SV; Donin NM
Transl Androl Urol; 2023 Oct; 12(10):1561-1567. PubMed ID: 37969777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the quality, accuracy, and readability of patient information on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) on the internet available in English: a cross-sectional study.
Vågenes H; Pranić SM
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 May; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 37189154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented Web-based information regarding tooth avulsion.
Nangia D; Saini A; Krishnan A; Sharma S; Kumar V; Chawla A; Logani A
Dent Traumatol; 2022 Aug; 38(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 35225429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.
Worrall AP; Connolly MJ; O'Neill A; O'Doherty M; Thornton KP; McNally C; McConkey SJ; de Barra E
BMC Public Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1635. PubMed ID: 33183297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment.
Haffar A; Hirsch A; Morrill C; Garcia A; Werner Z; Gearhart JP; Crigger C
Res Rep Urol; 2024; 16():39-44. PubMed ID: 38370509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.
Lucy AT; Rakestraw SL; Stringer C; Chu D; Grams J; Stahl R; Mustian MN
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6519-6525. PubMed ID: 37277519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
Raja H; Patel K
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal conditions from top academic orthopedic institutions.
Michel C; Dijanic C; Abdelmalek G; Sudah S; Kerrigan D; Gorgy G; Yalamanchili P
J Child Orthop; 2023 Jun; 17(3):284-290. PubMed ID: 37288046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.
Murphy B; Irwin S; Condon F; Kennedy C
Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e366-e370. PubMed ID: 35034835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.
Irwin SC; Lennon DT; Stanley CP; Sheridan GA; Walsh JC
Surgeon; 2021 Dec; 19(6):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 33451875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability of online monkeypox patient education materials: Improved recognition of health literacy is needed for dissemination of infectious disease information.
Frost JC; Baldwin AJ
Infect Dis Health; 2023 May; 28(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 36564245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.
Steiner SM; Slavych BK; Zraick RI
Dysphagia; 2023 Jun; 38(3):990-1000. PubMed ID: 36205800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction.
Pattenden TA; Raleigh RA; Pattenden ER; Thangasamy IA
BJUI Compass; 2021 Nov; 2(6):412-418. PubMed ID: 35474701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.
Mehta MP; Swindell HW; Westermann RW; Rosneck JT; Lynch TS
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jul; 34(7):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 29631940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
