167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37854380)
1. Comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of different surgical techniques in myopic macular hole without retinal detachment.
Ozbek M; Ozcaliskan S; Alagoz C; Artunay O
Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(10):1651-1656. PubMed ID: 37854380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole.
Ghoraba H; Rittiphairoj T; Akhavanrezayat A; Karaca I; Matsumiya W; Pham B; Mishra K; Yasar C; Mobasserian A; Abdelkarem AA; Nguyen QD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD015031. PubMed ID: 37548231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Foveal microstructure and visual outcomes of myopic macular hole surgery with or without the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique.
Hu XT; Pan QT; Zheng JW; Zhang ZD
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 103(10):1495-1502. PubMed ID: 30470714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study.
Ramtohul P; Parrat E; Denis D; Lorenzi U
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 31907015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in High Myopia.
Matsumae H; Morizane Y; Yamane S; Yanagisawa S; Sakurai T; Kobori A; Imai H; Kanzaki Y; Suzuki E; Kadonosono K; Hayashi A; Shiraga F; Kuriyama S
Ophthalmol Retina; 2020 Sep; 4(9):919-926. PubMed ID: 32448780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Ling L; Liu Y; Zhou B; Gao F; Hu Z; Tian M; Xing Y; Ji K; Sun T; Zhou W
J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():2374650. PubMed ID: 32908680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EFFECT OF INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP ON CLOSURE RATE, POSTOPERATIVE VISUAL ACUITY, AND RESTORATION OF OUTER RETINAL LAYERS IN PRIMARY IDIOPATHIC MACULAR HOLE SURGERY.
Baumann C; Kaye S; Iannetta D; Sultan Z; Dwivedi R; Pearce I
Retina; 2020 Oct; 40(10):1955-1963. PubMed ID: 31834129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique as a useful procedure for macular hole-associated retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.
Sasaki H; Shiono A; Kogo J; Yomoda R; Munemasa Y; Syoda M; Otake H; Kurihara H; Kitaoka Y; Takagi H
Eye (Lond); 2017 Apr; 31(4):545-550. PubMed ID: 27911448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
Yuan J; Zhang LL; Lu YJ; Han MY; Yu AH; Cai XJ
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):219. PubMed ID: 29179705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomical and functional results after vitrectomy with conventional ILM peeling versus inverted ILM flap technique in large full-thickness macular holes.
Dera AU; Stoll D; Schoeneberger V; Walckling M; Brockmann C; Fuchsluger TA; Schaub F
Int J Retina Vitreous; 2023 Nov; 9(1):68. PubMed ID: 37964333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modified superior inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique with vitrectomy versus vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for retinal detachment with myopic macular hole.
Crespo Carballés MJ; Sastre-Ibáñez M; Prieto Del Cura M; Jimeno Anaya L; Pastora Salvador N; Quijada Angeli S; Garrido Ceca G; Garcia-Saenz MC
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2022 Sep; 97(9):514-520. PubMed ID: 35787380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EFFICACY OF THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITH VITRECTOMY FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES.
Baba R; Wakabayashi Y; Umazume K; Ishikawa T; Yagi H; Muramatsu D; Goto H
Retina; 2017 Mar; 37(3):466-471. PubMed ID: 28225722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LARGE SERIES OF PATIENTS.
Rizzo S; Tartaro R; Barca F; Caporossi T; Bacherini D; Giansanti F
Retina; 2018 Sep; 38 Suppl 1():S73-S78. PubMed ID: 29232338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique and the Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole with Retinal Detachment.
Matsumura T; Takamura Y; Tomomatsu T; Arimura S; Gozawa M; Kobori A; Inatani M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165068. PubMed ID: 27764184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. COMPARISON OF THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE INSERTION TECHNIQUE AND THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITH VITRECTOMY TO TREAT MACULAR HOLE-ASSOCIATED RETINAL DETACHMENT.
Zhu K; Lei B; Wong W; Zhang J; Guo Y; Chen H; Song F; Chang Q; Xu G; Zhang Y
Retina; 2021 Jan; 41(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 32310627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis.
Zheng D; Huang Z; Zeng Q; Wang Y; Chen S; Yi J; Fang D; Huang D; Chen W
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):444. PubMed ID: 36401229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: one-year study.
Wakabayashi T; Ikuno Y; Shiraki N; Matsumura N; Sakaguchi H; Nishida K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 256(8):1387-1393. PubMed ID: 29911271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery: Remodelling of Outer Retinal Layers after Traditional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique.
Bottoni F; Parrulli S; Mete M; D'Agostino I; Cereda M; Cigada M; Maggio E; Maraone G; Iacovello D; Bottega E; Staurenghi G; Pertile G
Ophthalmologica; 2020; 243(5):334-341. PubMed ID: 31940651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PERFLUOROCARBON LIQUID-ASSISTED INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING FOR HIGHLY MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE RETINAL DETACHMENT.
Gu X; Hu Z; Qian H; Fransisca S; Mugisha A; Wang J; Zhang Z; Zhang W; Ji J; Liu Q; Xie P
Retina; 2021 Feb; 41(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 32453066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of non-fovea-sparing ILM peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis with and without macular hole.
Al-Badawi AH; Abdelhakim MASE; Macky TA; Mortada HA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 103(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 29712637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
