These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37855082)

  • 1. The over-citation of Daubert in forensic anthropology.
    Lesciotto KM; Christensen AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 37855082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of Daubert on the admissibility of forensic anthropology expert testimony.
    Lesciotto KM
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 25716577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
    Grivas CR; Komar DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):913-7. PubMed ID: 21729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
    Berger MA
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of Daubert: implications for testimony and research in forensic anthropology (and the use of frontal sinuses in personal identification).
    Christensen AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 May; 49(3):427-30. PubMed ID: 15171154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
    Cecil JS
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meeting a Forensic Podiatry Admissibility Challenge: A Daubert Case Study.
    Nirenberg M
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):833-841. PubMed ID: 27122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
    Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
    Thatcher RW; Biver CJ; North DM
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Apr; 34(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12784902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.
    Neufeld PJ
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S107-13. PubMed ID: 16030325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.
    Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 11725885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice: Deference, Daubert, or Different Direction.
    Gvozdenovic M
    J Law Med; 2022 Dec; 29(4):1220-1235. PubMed ID: 36763027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Osteopathic physicians and expert medical testimony.
    McAbee GN
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1997 Jan; 97(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9029880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.