These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37855082)

  • 21. A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.
    Marlowe DB
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 10150377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.
    Gatowski SI; Dobbin SA; Richardson JT; Ginsburg GP; Merlino ML; Dahir V
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):433-58. PubMed ID: 11688367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: does it meet the Daubert standard?
    Rogers R; Salekin RT; Sewell KW
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Aug; 23(4):425-43. PubMed ID: 10439726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
    Booth BD; Watts J; Dufour M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Aug; 47(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 31097525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?
    Lally SJ
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits.
    Vallabhajosula B; van Gorp WG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 11471788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Capillary electrophoresis in court: the landmark decision of the People of Tennessee versus Ware.
    Marchi E; Pasacreta RJ
    J Capillary Electrophor; 1997; 4(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 9627830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.
    Haack S
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Avoiding ipse dixit mislabeling: post-Daubert approaches to expert clinical opinions.
    Gutheil TG; Bursztajn H
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 12875499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Representation and re-presentation in litigation science.
    Jasanoff S
    Environ Health Perspect; 2008 Jan; 116(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 18197311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
    Melnick RL
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.
    Lakoff GP
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S114-20. PubMed ID: 16030326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Standardizing the psychological autopsy: addressing the Daubert standard.
    Snider JE; Hane S; Berman AL
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2006 Oct; 36(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 17087630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
    Krauss DA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The admissibility of expert evidence in Canada.
    Glancy GD; Bradford JM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 17872558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neuropsychiatry at the Courtroom Gates: Selective Entry or Anything Goes?
    Brakel SJ; Gonzalez ER; Cavanaugh JL
    Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry; 1996 Jul; 1(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 10320423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.