These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37855587)

  • 1. Unsupervised-learning-based calibration method in microscopic fringe projection profilometry.
    Yuan Q; Wu J; Zhang H; Yu J; Ye Y
    Appl Opt; 2023 Sep; 62(27):7299-7315. PubMed ID: 37855587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep-learning-based adaptive camera calibration for various defocusing degrees.
    Zhang J; Luo B; Xiang Z; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Su X; Liu J; Li L; Wang W
    Opt Lett; 2021 Nov; 46(22):5537-5540. PubMed ID: 34780397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsupervised deep learning for 3D reconstruction with dual-frequency fringe projection profilometry.
    Fan S; Liu S; Zhang X; Huang H; Liu W; Jin P
    Opt Express; 2021 Sep; 29(20):32547-32567. PubMed ID: 34615322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large DOF microscopic fringe projection profilometry with a coaxial light-field structure.
    Meng W; Quanyao H; Yongkai Y; Yang Y; Qijian T; Xiang P; Xiaoli L
    Opt Express; 2022 Feb; 30(5):8015-8026. PubMed ID: 35299552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate calibration for fringe projection profilometry based on an improved subpixel mapping with local gray distribution.
    Liu B; He X; Wang C; Wang S; Wu G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2023 Dec; 40(12):2164-2176. PubMed ID: 38086025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weakly Supervised Depth Estimation for 3D Imaging with Single Camera Fringe Projection Profilometry.
    Tan C; Song W
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38475237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telecentric 3D profilometry based on phase-shifting fringe projection.
    Li D; Liu C; Tian J
    Opt Express; 2014 Dec; 22(26):31826-35. PubMed ID: 25607150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate calibration method for camera and projector in fringe patterns measurement system.
    Chen R; Xu J; Chen H; Su J; Zhang Z; Chen K
    Appl Opt; 2016 Jun; 55(16):4293-300. PubMed ID: 27411178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible and accurate system calibration method in microscopic fringe projection profilometry.
    Du J; Luo X; Zhu J; An S; Zhou P
    Appl Opt; 2024 Jan; 63(2):383-389. PubMed ID: 38227232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Depth-driven variable-frequency sinusoidal fringe pattern for accuracy improvement in fringe projection profilometry.
    Rao G; Song L; Zhang S; Yang X; Chen K; Xu J
    Opt Express; 2018 Aug; 26(16):19986-20008. PubMed ID: 30119317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-Shot 3D Reconstruction via Nonlinear Fringe Transformation: Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Approaches.
    Nguyen AH; Wang Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 38794100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite fringe projection deep learning profilometry for single-shot absolute 3D shape measurement.
    Li Y; Qian J; Feng S; Chen Q; Zuo C
    Opt Express; 2022 Jan; 30(3):3424-3442. PubMed ID: 35209601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-Accuracy Three-Dimensional Deformation Measurement System Based on Fringe Projection and Speckle Correlation.
    Zhang C; Liu C; Xu Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hybrid calibration procedure for fringe projection profilometry based on stereo vision and polynomial fitting.
    Vargas R; Marrugo AG; Zhang S; Romero LA
    Appl Opt; 2020 May; 59(13):D163-D169. PubMed ID: 32400639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibration method for projector-camera-based telecentric fringe projection profilometry system.
    Liu H; Lin H; Yao L
    Opt Express; 2017 Dec; 25(25):31492-31508. PubMed ID: 29245824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High dynamic defocus response method for binary defocusing fringe projection profilometry.
    Zheng Z; Gao J; Zhuang Y; Zhang L; Chen X
    Opt Lett; 2021 Aug; 46(15):3749-3752. PubMed ID: 34329272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible calibration method for telecentric fringe projection profilometry systems.
    Rao L; Da F; Kong W; Huang H
    Opt Express; 2016 Jan; 24(2):1222-37. PubMed ID: 26832505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Active projection nonlinear
    Wang L; Zhang Y; Yi L; Hao X; Wang M; Wang X
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 Nov; 39(11):1983-1991. PubMed ID: 36520694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsupervised arterial spin labeling image superresolution via multiscale generative adversarial network.
    Cui J; Gong K; Han P; Liu H; Li Q
    Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2373-2385. PubMed ID: 35048390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal defocus selection based on normed Fourier transform for digital fringe pattern profilometry.
    Kamagara A; Wang X; Li S
    Appl Opt; 2017 Oct; 56(28):8014-8022. PubMed ID: 29047791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.