These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37857130)

  • 1. Breast cancer risk prediction using Tyrer-Cuzick algorithm with an 18-SNPs polygenic risk score in a European population with below-average breast cancer incidence.
    Oblak T; Škerl P; Narang BJ; Blagus R; Krajc M; Novaković S; Žgajnar J
    Breast; 2023 Dec; 72():103590. PubMed ID: 37857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry.
    Pal Choudhury P; Brook MN; Hurson AN; Lee A; Mulder CV; Coulson P; Schoemaker MJ; Jones ME; Swerdlow AJ; Chatterjee N; Antoniou AC; Garcia-Closas M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Feb; 23(1):22. PubMed ID: 33588869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of the IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick model of breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Kurian AW; Hughes E; Simmons T; Bernhisel R; Probst B; Meek S; Caswell-Jin JL; John EM; Lanchbury JS; Slavin TP; Wagner S; Gutin A; Rohan TE; Shadyab AH; Manson JE; Lane D; Chlebowski RT; Stefanick ML
    Cancer; 2021 Oct; 127(20):3742-3750. PubMed ID: 34228814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density.
    Brentnall AR; van Veen EM; Harkness EF; Rafiq S; Byers H; Astley SM; Sampson S; Howell A; Newman WG; Cuzick J; Evans DGR
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Apr; 146(8):2122-2129. PubMed ID: 31251818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer risk based on adapted IBIS prediction model in Slovenian women aged 40-49 years - could it be better?
    Oblak T; Zadnik V; Krajc M; Lokar K; Zgajnar J
    Radiol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 54(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 32614783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer pathology and stage are better predicted by risk stratification models that include mammographic density and common genetic variants.
    Evans DGR; Harkness EF; Brentnall AR; van Veen EM; Astley SM; Byers H; Sampson S; Southworth J; Stavrinos P; Howell SJ; Maxwell AJ; Howell A; Newman WG; Cuzick J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 176(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 30941651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive Breast Cancer Risk Assessment for
    Gallagher S; Hughes E; Kurian AW; Domchek SM; Garber J; Probst B; Morris B; Tshiaba P; Meek S; Rosenthal E; Roa B; Slavin TP; Wagner S; Weitzel J; Gutin A; Lanchbury JS; Robson M
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2021 Jun; 5():. PubMed ID: 34322652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density.
    Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Buist DSM; Bowles EJA
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Sep; 4(9):e180174. PubMed ID: 29621362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating Clinical and Polygenic Factors to Predict Breast Cancer Risk in Women Undergoing Genetic Testing.
    Hughes E; Tshiaba P; Wagner S; Judkins T; Rosenthal E; Roa B; Gallagher S; Meek S; Dalton K; Hedegard W; Adami CA; Grear DF; Domchek SM; Garber J; Lancaster JM; Weitzel JN; Kurian AW; Lanchbury JS; Gutin A; Robson ME
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2021; 5():. PubMed ID: 34036224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail in Breast Cancer Screening in Jiangxi Province, China.
    Zhang L; Jie Z; Xu S; Zhang L; Guo X
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Aug; 24():5528-5532. PubMed ID: 30089770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening Strategy Modification Based on Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Stratification and its Implementation in the National Guidelines - Pilot Study.
    Krajc M; Gareth Evans D; Blatnik A; Lokar K; Žagar T; Tomšič S; Žgajnar J; Zadnik V
    Zdr Varst; 2020 Dec; 59(4):211-218. PubMed ID: 33133277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Tyrer-Cuzick Model Inaccurately Predicts Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in Women With LCIS.
    Valero MG; Zabor EC; Park A; Gilbert E; Newman A; King TA; Pilewskie ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):736-740. PubMed ID: 31559544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia.
    Boughey JC; Hartmann LC; Anderson SS; Degnim AC; Vierkant RA; Reynolds CA; Frost MH; Pankratz VS
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Aug; 28(22):3591-6. PubMed ID: 20606088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer risk assessment and risk distribution in 3,491 Slovenian women invited for screening at the age of 50; a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Jarm K; Zadnik V; Birk M; Vrhovec M; Hertl K; Klanecek Z; Studen A; Sval C; Krajc M
    Radiol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 57(3):337-347. PubMed ID: 37665745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer risk stratification in women of screening age: Incremental effects of adding mammographic density, polygenic risk, and a gene panel.
    Evans DGR; van Veen EM; Harkness EF; Brentnall AR; Astley SM; Byers H; Woodward ER; Sampson S; Southworth J; Howell SJ; Maxwell AJ; Newman WG; Cuzick J; Howell A
    Genet Med; 2022 Jul; 24(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 35426792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Personalized Genetic Breast Cancer Risk Estimation With Polygenic Risk Scores on Preventive Endocrine Therapy Intention and Uptake.
    Kim JO; Schaid DJ; Vachon CM; Cooke A; Couch FJ; Kim CA; Sinnwell JP; Hasadsri L; Stan DL; Goldenberg B; Neal L; Grenier D; Degnim AC; Thicke LA; Pruthi S
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2021 Feb; 14(2):175-184. PubMed ID: 33097489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Value of Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score with Nongenetic Factors for Predicting Breast Cancer Diagnosis in the UK Biobank.
    Collister JA; Liu X; Littlejohns TJ; Cuzick J; Clifton L; Hunter DJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2024 Jun; 33(6):812-820. PubMed ID: 38630597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An integrated breast cancer risk assessment and management model based on fuzzy cognitive maps.
    Subramanian J; Karmegam A; Papageorgiou E; Papandrianos N; Vasukie A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Mar; 118(3):280-97. PubMed ID: 25697987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer risk prediction using a polygenic risk score in the familial setting: a prospective study from the Breast Cancer Family Registry and kConFab.
    Li H; Feng B; Miron A; Chen X; Beesley J; Bimeh E; Barrowdale D; John EM; Daly MB; Andrulis IL; Buys SS; Kraft P; ; Thorne H; Chenevix-Trench G; Southey MC; Antoniou AC; James PA; Terry MB; Phillips KA; Hopper JL; Mitchell G; Goldgar DE
    Genet Med; 2017 Jan; 19(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 27171545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discovery of breast cancer risk genes and establishment of a prediction model based on estrogen metabolism regulation.
    Zhao F; Hao Z; Zhong Y; Xu Y; Guo M; Zhang B; Yin X; Li Y; Zhou X
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):194. PubMed ID: 33632172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.