These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37858934)

  • 1. Assessment of the assessment-All about complexes.
    Studer G; Tauriello G; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1850-1860. PubMed ID: 37858934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing "best single template" models as reference baseline for the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO).
    Haas J; Gumienny R; Barbato A; Ackermann F; Tauriello G; Bertoni M; Studer G; Smolinski A; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1378-1387. PubMed ID: 31571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.
    Haas J; Barbato A; Behringer D; Studer G; Roth S; Bertoni M; Mostaguir K; Gumienny R; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):387-398. PubMed ID: 29178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of AI-based modeling on the accuracy of protein assembly prediction: Insights from CASP15.
    Ozden B; Kryshtafovych A; Karaca E
    Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1636-1657. PubMed ID: 37861057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of model accuracy in CASP15 using the ModFOLDdock server.
    Edmunds NS; Alharbi SMA; Genc AG; Adiyaman R; McGuffin LJ
    Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1871-1878. PubMed ID: 37314190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP13: Challenges in the era of deep learning.
    Won J; Baek M; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Seok C
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1351-1360. PubMed ID: 31436360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11.
    Kryshtafovych A; Barbato A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):349-69. PubMed ID: 26344049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions.
    Cozzetto D; Kryshtafovych A; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():157-66. PubMed ID: 19714774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XV.
    Kryshtafovych A; Schwede T; Topf M; Fidelis K; Moult J
    Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1539-1549. PubMed ID: 37920879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9.
    Kryshtafovych A; Fidelis K; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):91-106. PubMed ID: 21997462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of data-assisted prediction by inclusion of crosslinking/mass-spectrometry and small angle X-ray scattering data in the 12
    Tamò GE; Abriata LA; Fonti G; Dal Peraro M
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():215-227. PubMed ID: 29235142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category.
    Cozzetto D; Kryshtafovych A; Ceriani M; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():175-83. PubMed ID: 17680695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic structure prediction of oligomeric assemblies using Robetta in CASP12.
    Park H; Kim DE; Ovchinnikov S; Baker D; DiMaio F
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):283-291. PubMed ID: 28913931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions.
    Ozden B; Kryshtafovych A; Karaca E
    Proteins; 2021 Dec; 89(12):1787-1799. PubMed ID: 34337786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CASP prediction center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL.
    Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):7-13. PubMed ID: 24038551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP12.
    Lafita A; Bliven S; Kryshtafovych A; Bertoni M; Monastyrskyy B; Duarte JM; Schwede T; Capitani G
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):247-256. PubMed ID: 29071742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.
    Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):345-360. PubMed ID: 28833563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New prediction categories in CASP15.
    Kryshtafovych A; Antczak M; Szachniuk M; Zok T; Kretsch RC; Rangan R; Pham P; Das R; Robin X; Studer G; Durairaj J; Eberhardt J; Sweeney A; Topf M; Schwede T; Fidelis K; Moult J
    Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1550-1557. PubMed ID: 37306011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RNA target highlights in CASP15: Evaluation of predicted models by structure providers.
    Kretsch RC; Andersen ES; Bujnicki JM; Chiu W; Das R; Luo B; Masquida B; McRae EKS; Schroeder GM; Su Z; Wedekind JE; Xu L; Zhang K; Zheludev IN; Moult J; Kryshtafovych A
    Proteins; 2023 Dec; 91(12):1600-1615. PubMed ID: 37466021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO)-Perspectives on the future of fully automated evaluation of structure prediction methods.
    Robin X; Haas J; Gumienny R; Smolinski A; Tauriello G; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2021 Dec; 89(12):1977-1986. PubMed ID: 34387007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.