These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3786092)
1. Measuring channel dependence in separate activation models. Colonius H Percept Psychophys; 1986 Oct; 40(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 3786092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets. Eriksen CW Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 3405746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect. Schwarz W Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):498-500. PubMed ID: 2813037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A further test of the superposition model for the redundant-signals effect in bimodal detection. Diederich A; Colonius H Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 1881769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time]. Dufft CC; Ulrich R Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 10067137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The "new look" in studies of schizophrenic attention and information processing. Spring B; Nuechterlein KH; Sugarman J; Matthysse S Schizophr Bull; 1977; 3(3):470-82. PubMed ID: 21447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reaction time and temporal serial judgment: corroboration or dissociation?]. Neumann O; Koch R; Niepel M; Tappe T Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):621-45. PubMed ID: 1295274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metrical rhythm implicitly orients attention in time as indexed by improved target detection and left inferior parietal activation. Bolger D; Coull JT; Schön D J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):593-605. PubMed ID: 24168222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modality, difficulty, and "coupling" in vigilance behavior. Loeb M; Binford JR Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 5142063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention bias and the relation of perception lag to simple reaction time. Sanford AJ J Exp Psychol; 1974 Mar; 102(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 4815190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring performance across sense modes: an individual differences approach. Tyler DM; Waag WL; Halcomb CG Hum Factors; 1972 Dec; 14(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 4661179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reaction time as a psychophysical method in psychiatric research. Kietzman ML; Sutton S Schizophr Bull; 1977; 3(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 918572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Time-shrinking perception' in the visual system: a psychophysical and high-density ERP study. Nagaike A; Mitsudo T; Nakajima Y; Ogata K; Yamasaki T; Goto Y; Tobimatsu S Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3279-3290. PubMed ID: 27401472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novelty, recency and frequency effects on visual recognition and pseudo-recognition thresholds. Pyke SW Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):847-56. PubMed ID: 5040499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Attention and hemispheric differences in reaction time during simultaneous audio-visual tasks. Geffen G; Bradshaw JL; Nettleton NC Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 25(3):404-12. PubMed ID: 4807296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological considerations for the study of multimodal signal detection. Stanislaw H Percept Psychophys; 1988 Dec; 44(6):541-50. PubMed ID: 3059316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception. Shulman HG; Greenberg SN J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 88(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 5577172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanisms of early selective attention in auditory and visual modalities. Hillyard SA; Woldorff M; Mangun GR; Hansen JC Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987; 39():317-24. PubMed ID: 3477441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]