These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3786095)

  • 1. Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions.
    Heister G; Ehrenstein WH; Schroeder-Heister P
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Oct; 40(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 3786095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: effects of irrelevant stimulus location.
    Heister G; Ehrenstein WH; Schroeder-Heister P
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 3627940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.
    Ehrenstein WH; Schroeder-Heister P; Heister G
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Mar; 45(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 2710619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise, S-R compatibility and hand dominance.
    Smith A
    Scand J Psychol; 1988; 29(3-4):180-5. PubMed ID: 3232040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. S-R compatibility effect or cerebral laterality effect? Comments on a controversy.
    Heister G; Schroeder-Heister P
    Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(3):427-30. PubMed ID: 4022311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cerebral specialization in young adults with Down syndrome.
    Elliott D; Edwards JM; Weeks DJ; Lindley S; Carnahan H
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Mar; 91(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 2952011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proprioception and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Worringham CJ; Kerr GK
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 10718064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial S-R compatibility under head tilt.
    Schroeder-Heister P; Heister G; Ehrenstein WH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 3245476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A note on location of the decisional stages of choice reactions in the left hemisphere.
    Heister G; Schroeder-Heister P
    Cortex; 1984 Jun; 20(2):271-9. PubMed ID: 6744896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subliminal priming and effects of hand dominance.
    Serrien DJ; Sovijärvi-Spapé MM; Rana G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Sep; 141(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 22858876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).
    Murchison NM; Proctor RW
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 23972054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements?
    Gabbard C; Rabb C
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 10843260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cerebral organization of verbal and motor functions in left-handed and right-handed adults: effects of concurrent verbal tasks on unimanual tapping performance.
    van Strien JW; Bouma A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1988 Mar; 10(2):139-56. PubMed ID: 3350915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response-compatibility effects in focused-attention tasks: a same-hand advantage in response activation.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jan; 43(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 3340504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new approach to cerebral asymmetry: RT differences in simultaneous bimanual finger movement during verbal and nonverbal tasks.
    Wünscher T; Jordan K; Gille HG; Roth N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 2342853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect.
    Valle-Inclán F; Redondo M
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 9643051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant auditory attention shifts prime corresponding responses.
    Notebaert W; Soetens E
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 12684781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship of movement time to hand-foot laterality patterns.
    Olex-Zarychta D; Raczek J
    Laterality; 2008 Sep; 13(5):439-55. PubMed ID: 18608857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.