These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37861987)

  • 1. Clinical Comparison of High-resolution and Standard Refractions and Prescriptions.
    Meyer D; Rickert M; Reed O; Joret P; Kollbaum P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 100(11):751-760. PubMed ID: 37861987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dioptric differences between clinically determined and metric-optimised refractions for adults with Down syndrome.
    Plaumann MD; Marsack JD; Benoit JS; Manny RE; Anderson HA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1016-1028. PubMed ID: 37208971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach.
    Leube A; Kraft C; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 May; 101(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 29356102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective refraction using power vectors by updating a conventional phoropter with a Stokes lens for continuous astigmatic power generation.
    Moreno JRA; Micó V; Albarrán Diego C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 37264763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.
    He M; Congdon N; MacKenzie G; Zeng Y; Silver JD; Ellwein L
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21232802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a Novel Binocular Refraction System with Standard Digital Phoropter Refraction.
    Bossie T; Reilly J; Vera-Diaz FA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Jul; 100(7):451-458. PubMed ID: 37369097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction.
    Bullimore MA; Fusaro RE; Adams CW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Aug; 75(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 9734807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.
    Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Lopez N; Salmon T; Bradley A
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):584-9. PubMed ID: 8942130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children.
    Gil A; Hernández CS; Pérez-Merino P; Rubio M; Velarde G; Abellanas-Lodares M; Román-Daza Á; Alejandre N; Jiménez-Alfaro I; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240933. PubMed ID: 33112912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instant vision assessment device for measuring refraction in low vision.
    Cheng D; Woo GC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Sep; 104(7):780-787. PubMed ID: 33689633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
    Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and precision of automated subjective refraction in young hyperopes under cycloplegia.
    Carracedo G; Carpena-Torres C; Pastrana C; Rodríguez-Lafora M; Serramito M; Privado-Aroco A; Espinosa-Vidal TM
    J Optom; 2023; 16(4):252-260. PubMed ID: 37019707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction.
    Huang J; Li X; Yan T; Wen L; Pan L; Yang Z
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 11(11):16. PubMed ID: 36394842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.