These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37862058)

  • 1. Comparison of Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Approaches for Relative Binding Free Energy Predictions.
    Wan S; Bhati AP; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Nov; 19(21):7846-7860. PubMed ID: 37862058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large Scale Study of Ligand-Protein Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations: Actionable Predictions from Statistically Robust Protocols.
    Bhati AP; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Apr; 18(4):2687-2702. PubMed ID: 35293737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Baumann HM; Gapsys V; de Groot BL; Mobley DL
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 May; 125(17):4241-4261. PubMed ID: 33905257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
    Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.
    Huai Z; Yang H; Li X; Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 33037549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SAMPL9 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
    Procacci P; Guarnieri G
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Apr; 156(16):164104. PubMed ID: 35490003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Alchemical Transfer Method for the Estimation of Relative Binding Affinities of Molecular Series.
    Sabanés Zariquiey F; Pérez A; Majewski M; Gallicchio E; De Fabritiis G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Apr; 63(8):2438-2444. PubMed ID: 37042797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.
    Raman EP; Paul TJ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7895-7914. PubMed ID: 33201701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binding Free Energies of Host-Guest Systems by Nonequilibrium Alchemical Simulations with Constrained Dynamics: Illustrative Calculations and Numerical Validation.
    Giovannelli E; Cioni M; Procacci P; Cardini G; Pagliai M; Volkov V; Chelli R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):5887-5899. PubMed ID: 29112430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Addressing Suboptimal Poses in Nonequilibrium Alchemical Calculations.
    Karrenbrock M; Rizzi V; Procacci P; Gervasio FL
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Feb; 128(7):1595-1605. PubMed ID: 38323915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological uncertainties in drug-receptor binding free energy predictions based on classical molecular dynamics.
    Procacci P
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2021 Apr; 67():127-134. PubMed ID: 33220532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alchemical determination of drug-receptor binding free energy: Where we stand and where we could move to.
    Procacci P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Jan; 71():233-241. PubMed ID: 27984798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid, Accurate, Precise, and Reliable Relative Free Energy Prediction Using Ensemble Based Thermodynamic Integration.
    Bhati AP; Wan S; Wright DW; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):210-222. PubMed ID: 27997169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility.
    Wade AD; Bhati AP; Wan S; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):3972-3987. PubMed ID: 35609233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the Potential of Mean Force and Nonequilibrium Pulling Simulations by Simultaneous Alchemical Modifications.
    Reif MM; Zacharias M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):3873-3893. PubMed ID: 35653503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.
    Gill SC; Lim NM; Grinaway PB; Rustenburg AS; Fass J; Ross GA; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(21):5579-5598. PubMed ID: 29486559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models.
    Cappel D; Hall ML; Lenselink EB; Beuming T; Qi J; Bradner J; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2388-2400. PubMed ID: 28024402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.
    Lee TS; Allen BK; Giese TJ; Guo Z; Li P; Lin C; McGee TD; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Tao Y; Tsai HC; Xu H; Sherman W; York DM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5595-5623. PubMed ID: 32936637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.